Skip to content

Revert "[WebAssembly][FastISel] Fold i64 extension chains into widened loads"#188306

Merged
vitalybuka merged 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-187934-i179672
Mar 24, 2026
Merged

Revert "[WebAssembly][FastISel] Fold i64 extension chains into widened loads"#188306
vitalybuka merged 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-187934-i179672

Conversation

@vitalybuka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Reverts #187934

Breaks bots.

@QuantumSegfault
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I don't understand. The failures seem unrelated...

@QuantumSegfault
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ping @dschuff, @ParkHanbum. This gets automerged in 30-40 minutes...

Is this reversion actually necessary? The failures seemed unrelated to the actual changes?

@vitalybuka vitalybuka merged commit 03e8fd6 into main Mar 24, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@vitalybuka vitalybuka deleted the revert-187934-i179672 branch March 24, 2026 18:59
@vitalybuka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Ping @dschuff, @ParkHanbum. This gets automerged in 30-40 minutes...

Is this reversion actually necessary? The failures seemed unrelated to the actual changes?

Oh, I intended to revert #186966, copy-pasted a wrong one..

vitalybuka added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2026
llvm-sync bot pushed a commit to arm/arm-toolchain that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2026
Aadarsh-Keshri pushed a commit to Aadarsh-Keshri/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2026
Aadarsh-Keshri pushed a commit to Aadarsh-Keshri/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2026
sriyalamar pushed a commit to sriyalamar/cpullvm-toolchain that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…d loads" (#188324)

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#188306
Relands llvm/llvm-project#187934

It was reverted by mistake.

(cherry picked from commit 55bbf7b)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backend:WebAssembly skip-precommit-approval PR for CI feedback, not intended for review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants