[CIR] Upstream Load/Store Complex with volatile qualifier#167216
Merged
AmrDeveloper merged 3 commits intollvm:mainfrom Nov 12, 2025
Merged
[CIR] Upstream Load/Store Complex with volatile qualifier#167216AmrDeveloper merged 3 commits intollvm:mainfrom
AmrDeveloper merged 3 commits intollvm:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper) ChangesUpstream supporting Load/Store ops for Complex with volatile qualifier Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167216.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprComplex.cpp b/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprComplex.cpp
index 047f3599eed03..9ed920085c8c6 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprComplex.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprComplex.cpp
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ mlir::Value ComplexExprEmitter::emitLoadOfLValue(LValue lv,
cgf.cgm.errorNYI(loc, "emitLoadOfLValue with Atomic LV");
const Address srcAddr = lv.getAddress();
- return builder.createLoad(cgf.getLoc(loc), srcAddr);
+ return builder.createLoad(cgf.getLoc(loc), srcAddr, lv.isVolatileQualified());
}
/// EmitStoreOfComplex - Store the specified real/imag parts into the
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ void ComplexExprEmitter::emitStoreOfComplex(mlir::Location loc, mlir::Value val,
}
const Address destAddr = lv.getAddress();
- builder.createStore(loc, val, destAddr);
+ builder.createStore(loc, val, destAddr, lv.isVolatileQualified());
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/complex.cpp b/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/complex.cpp
index 3fb78dc871904..fa60b4590035e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/complex.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/complex.cpp
@@ -1495,3 +1495,52 @@ void calling_function_that_return_complex() {
// OGCG: %[[A_IMAG_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { float, float }, ptr %[[A_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 1
// OGCG: store float %[[RESULT_REAL]], ptr %[[A_REAL_PTR]], align 4
// OGCG: store float %[[RESULT_IMAG]], ptr %[[A_IMAG_PTR]], align 4
+
+void load_store_volatile() {
+ volatile double _Complex a;
+ volatile double _Complex b;
+ a = b;
+
+ volatile int _Complex c;
+ volatile int _Complex d;
+ c = d;
+}
+
+// CIR: %[[A_ADDR:.*]] = cir.alloca !cir.complex<!cir.double>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.double>>, ["a"]
+// CIR: %[[B_ADDR:.*]] = cir.alloca !cir.complex<!cir.double>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.double>>, ["b"]
+// CIR: %[[C_ADDR:.*]] = cir.alloca !cir.complex<!s32i>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!s32i>>, ["c"]
+// CIR: %[[D_ADDR:.*]] = cir.alloca !cir.complex<!s32i>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!s32i>>, ["d"]
+// CIR: %[[TMP_B:.*]] = cir.load volatile {{.*}} %[[B_ADDR]] : !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.double>>, !cir.complex<!cir.double>
+// CIR: cir.store volatile {{.*}} %[[TMP_B]], %[[A_ADDR]] : !cir.complex<!cir.double>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.double>>
+// CIR: %[[TMP_D:.*]] = cir.load volatile {{.*}} %[[D_ADDR]] : !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!s32i>>, !cir.complex<!s32i>
+// CIR: cir.store volatile {{.*}} %[[TMP_D]], %[[C_ADDR]] : !cir.complex<!s32i>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!s32i>>
+
+// LLVM: %[[A_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { double, double }, i64 1, align 8
+// LLVM: %[[B_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { double, double }, i64 1, align 8
+// LLVM: %[[C_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { i32, i32 }, i64 1, align 4
+// LLVM: %[[D_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { i32, i32 }, i64 1, align 4
+// LLVM: %[[TMP_B:.*]] = load volatile { double, double }, ptr %[[B_ADDR]], align 8
+// LLVM: store volatile { double, double } %[[TMP_B]], ptr %[[A_ADDR]], align 8
+// LLVM: %[[TMP_D:.*]] = load volatile { i32, i32 }, ptr %[[D_ADDR]], align 4
+// LLVM: store volatile { i32, i32 } %[[TMP_D]], ptr %[[C_ADDR]], align 4
+
+// OGCG: %[[A_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { double, double }, align 8
+// OGCG: %[[B_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { double, double }, align 8
+// OGCG: %[[C_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { i32, i32 }, align 4
+// OGCG: %[[D_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { i32, i32 }, align 4
+// OGCG: %[[B_REAL_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { double, double }, ptr %[[B_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 0
+// OGCG: %[[B_REAL:.*]] = load volatile double, ptr %[[B_REAL_PTR]], align 8
+// OGCG: %[[B_IMAG_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { double, double }, ptr %[[B_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 1
+// OGCG: %[[B_IMAG:.*]] = load volatile double, ptr %[[B_IMAG_PTR]], align 8
+// OGCG: %[[A_REAL_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { double, double }, ptr %[[A_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 0
+// OGCG: %[[A_IMAG_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { double, double }, ptr %[[A_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 1
+// OGCG: store volatile double %[[B_REAL]], ptr %[[A_REAL_PTR]], align 8
+// OGCG: store volatile double %[[B_IMAG]], ptr %[[A_IMAG_PTR]], align 8
+// OGCG: %[[D_REAL_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { i32, i32 }, ptr %[[D_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 0
+// OGCG: %[[D_REAL:.*]] = load volatile i32, ptr %[[D_REAL_PTR]], align 4
+// OGCG: %[[D_IMAG_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { i32, i32 }, ptr %[[D_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 1
+// OGCG: %[[D_IMAG:.*]] = load volatile i32, ptr %[[D_IMAG_PTR]], align 4
+// OGCG: %[[C_REAL_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { i32, i32 }, ptr %[[C_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 0
+// OGCG: %[[C_IMAG_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { i32, i32 }, ptr %[[C_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 1
+// OGCG: store volatile i32 %[[D_REAL]], ptr %[[C_REAL_PTR]], align 4
+// OGCG: store volatile i32 %[[D_IMAG]], ptr %[[C_IMAG_PTR]], align 4
|
Lancern
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2025
andykaylor
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2025
Contributor
andykaylor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm with a request for expanding the test
Comment on lines
+1500
to
+1502
| volatile double _Complex a; | ||
| volatile double _Complex b; | ||
| a = b; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be better to have a test where the volatile qualifier is mixed to verify that we're attaching it to the correct loads and stores:
5a02c9d to
d30c783
Compare
git-crd
pushed a commit
to git-crd/crd-llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2025
Upstream supporting Load/Store ops for Complex with volatile qualifier
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Upstream supporting Load/Store ops for Complex with volatile qualifier