-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.4k
[mlir][vector] Simplify createReadOrMaskedRead #163736
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
banach-space
merged 3 commits into
llvm:main
from
banach-space:users/banach-space/vector/simplify_create_masked_read
Nov 11, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it start enforcing users to create VectorType when they don't have to? E.g., I searched the use in IREE, and we have one use. The type is
ShapedType; this API change forces the use to create VectorType when they dont have to.https://github.com/iree-org/iree/blob/fa46601cec6be66f0a2c95b7c95bd18682cc58be/compiler/src/iree/compiler/Codegen/Dialect/GPU/Transforms/Transforms.cpp#L1856-L1858
(I don't have a strong opinion, and I can fix IREE side. I mainly want to provide a data point that users will have to create VectorType when they don't care about scalable flags.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the feedback!
My thinking here was that
createReadOrMaskedReadalways creates an instance ofVectorType, so:VectorType, we make sure that we create it only once and then sizes are easier to track (i.e. "Where are these sizes coming from?")VectorType(like in your case), my PR creates extra burden on the users, but the number of instances ofVectorTypedoes not change.To make it easier for you, how about adding an overload:
WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sgtm, thanks!