Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[VPlan][Coverity] Fix coverity CID1579964. #121805

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

offsake
Copy link
Contributor

@offsake offsake commented Jan 6, 2025

Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp.

Coverity message with some context follows.

[Cov] var_compare_op: Comparing TermBr to null implies that TermBr might be null.
434 } else if (TermBr && !TermBr->isConditional()) {
435 TermBr->setSuccessor(0, NewBB);
436 } else {
437 // Set each forward successor here when it is created, excluding
438 // backedges. A backward successor is set when the branch is created.
439 unsigned idx = PredVPSuccessors.front() == this ? 0 : 1;

[Cov] CID 1579964: (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL)
[Cov] var_deref_model: Passing null pointer TermBr to getSuccessor, which dereferences it.

Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@offsake offsake marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2025 19:31
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jan 6, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-vectorizers

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: None (offsake)

Changes

Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121805.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.cpp (+4-4)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.cpp
index e804f81c36dba0..aa41c41e90c4c4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.cpp
@@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ void VPBasicBlock::connectToPredecessors(VPTransformState::CFGState &CFG) {
       // Set each forward successor here when it is created, excluding
       // backedges. A backward successor is set when the branch is created.
       unsigned idx = PredVPSuccessors.front() == this ? 0 : 1;
-      assert(
-          (!TermBr->getSuccessor(idx) ||
-           (isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(this) && TermBr->getSuccessor(idx) == NewBB)) &&
-          "Trying to reset an existing successor block.");
+      assert((TermBr && (!TermBr->getSuccessor(idx) ||
+                         (isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(this) &&
+                          TermBr->getSuccessor(idx) == NewBB))) &&
+             "Trying to reset an existing successor block.");
       TermBr->setSuccessor(idx, NewBB);
     }
     CFG.DTU.applyUpdates({{DominatorTree::Insert, PredBB, NewBB}});

@offsake
Copy link
Contributor Author

offsake commented Jan 6, 2025

Hi @fhahn,

could you please review as I expect the relevant code was introduced with:

commit 416a508
Author: Florian Hahn [email protected]
Date: Sat Jun 4 21:22:32 2022 +0100

[VPlan] Update vector latch terminator edge to exit block after execution.

Coverity hit link for reference:
https://scan6.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/60645/10600?selectedIssue=1579964

Also, could you please merge the patch if it looks good to you since I don't have writ permission to the repo?

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@fhahn fhahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the patch! Could you update the description to say what the issue was with the original code and how this patch fixes it?

I cannot view the covertity link; it asks for a password.

@offsake
Copy link
Contributor Author

offsake commented Jan 13, 2025

Thanks for the patch! Could you update the description to say what the issue was with the original code and how this patch fixes it?

I cannot view the covertity link; it asks for a password.

Just did.
Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@fhahn fhahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks

@fhahn fhahn merged commit 83be69c into llvm:main Jan 13, 2025
13 checks passed
Copy link

@offsake Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

DKLoehr pushed a commit to DKLoehr/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp.

Coverity message with some context follows.

[Cov] var_compare_op: Comparing TermBr to null implies that TermBr might
be null.
434    } else if (TermBr && !TermBr->isConditional()) {
435      TermBr->setSuccessor(0, NewBB);
436    } else {
437 // Set each forward successor here when it is created, excluding
438 // backedges. A backward successor is set when the branch is
created.
439      unsigned idx = PredVPSuccessors.front() == this ? 0 : 1;
     	
[Cov] CID 1579964: (llvm#1 of 1): Dereference after null check
(FORWARD_NULL)
[Cov] var_deref_model: Passing null pointer TermBr to getSuccessor,
which dereferences it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants