-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
Minor validation logic improvements #782
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hiroshihorie
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
hiroshi/validation-logic
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+42
−25
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
92a4e0c
Return .validation error for signal client
hiroshihorie ac3d3c4
Const status code
hiroshihorie e898941
Error type fixes
hiroshihorie a1257ed
Revert CancellationError wrap
hiroshihorie 666cbf3
Remove enums
hiroshihorie 79f7fb9
Merge branch 'main' into hiroshi/validation-logic
hiroshihorie f4f4e52
Merge branch 'hiroshi/validation-logic' of https://github.com/livekit…
hiroshihorie b55107a
Fix shadowing
hiroshihorie c74abb8
status code range
hiroshihorie 6667f57
invert throw
hiroshihorie File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
patch type="changed" "Minor validation logic improvements" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: I'd rename that to
authorization
(or better?), as this is very generic (not sure about other SDKs).Otherwise LGTM^2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we used to call this "validation", the endpoint (path is /validate)
client-sdk-swift/Sources/LiveKit/Support/Utils.swift
Line 170 in fc43f1e
So maybe validation is better ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If that matches backend, then why not