Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci tft tests #168

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

ci tft tests #168

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

spetrosi
Copy link
Collaborator

  • ci: Add tft plan and workflow
  • ci: Add tft plan and workflow

This change is for running tests in Testing Farm CI. This is a replacement for
BaseOS CI that we are currently using. Running it Testing Farm gives us more
control.

It adds a workflow for running tests, and a plans directory containing a test
plan and a README-plans.md with some info.

Note that this workflow runs from the main branch. This means that changes to
the workflow must be merged to main, then pull requests will be able to run it.
This is because the workflow uses on: issue_comment context, this is a security
measure recommended by GitHub. It saves us from leaking organization secrets.

The functionality is WIP, so await future fixes and updates.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Petrosian <[email protected]>
This change is for running tests in Testing Farm CI. This is a replacement for
BaseOS CI that we are currently using. Running it Testing Farm gives us more
control.

It adds a workflow for running tests, and a plans directory containing a test
plan and a README-plans.md with some info.

Note that this workflow runs from the main branch. This means that changes to
the workflow must be merged to main, then pull requests will be able to run it.
This is because the workflow uses on: issue_comment context, this is a security
measure recommended by GitHub. It saves us from leaking organization secrets.

The functionality is WIP, so await future fixes and updates.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Petrosian <[email protected]>
@spetrosi spetrosi closed this Jul 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant