Skip to content

Conversation

@cbrentharris
Copy link
Contributor

The project has moved to a new repo; please refer to apache/pinot#7968 and AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client#934 for motivation

Current usages of async http client when making SSL connections
is having issues. Upgrading the client, similar to pinot in this PR

apache/pinot#7968
@cbrentharris cbrentharris force-pushed the upgrade-async-http-client branch from 6162033 to 95b9d34 Compare January 22, 2024 16:13
Copy link

@aliciatang aliciatang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

Comment on lines +22 to 27
public static synchronized AsyncHttpClient getAsyncHttpClient() {
if (_client.get() == null) {
initialize(new AsyncHttpClientConfig.Builder().build());
initialize(new Builder().build());
}
return _client.get();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should instead introduce getAsyncHttpClient() alongside getNingClient() and mark getNingClient() as @Deprecated. I know the type has changed, and there's nothing we can do about that, but there are users of this code that will break if getNingClient() disappears on a minor version bump.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I need to confer with the team about the other breaking changes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only concern I would have with that is if ning needs a different version of netty (or other) that the new project needs. What are your thoughts on that behavior? Would you like to see the dependency resolution for netty?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants