LCORE-914: configuration for CodeRabbitAI

[tisnik]

Description

LCORE-914: configuration for CodeRabbitAI

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• CVE fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update
• Configuration Update
• Bump-up service version
• Bump-up dependent library
• Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
• CI configuration change
• Konflux configuration change
• Unit tests improvement
• Integration tests improvement
• End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

• Related Issue #LCORE-914

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added comprehensive automated code review and quality assurance infrastructure configuration. Enables multi-tool linting, static analysis, and automated quality checks across multiple programming languages. Enforces pre-merge standards for documentation and test coverage requirements. Integrates knowledge management and automated code analysis features to enhance code consistency, quality, and maintainability across the development workflow.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A comprehensive .coderabbit.yaml configuration file is introduced that centralizes settings for AI-assisted code reviews, including auto-review workflows, pre-merge checks, multi-tool linting configuration, chat integrations, and knowledge base setup.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CodeRabbit Configuration \.coderabbit\.yaml	Added centralized configuration schema with sections for general review settings, auto-review enablement, pre-merge checks across docstrings/titles/descriptions, tool-specific linting toggles (shellcheck, ruff, markdownlint, eslint, golangci-lint, yamllint, security analyzers), chat and knowledge base integrations, and code generation settings.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

• Verify configuration schema aligns with intended tooling integrations and enablement flags
• Confirm per-tool settings are appropriate for project requirements
• Review pre-merge check thresholds and ignore lists for accuracy
• Validate knowledge base and chat integration settings are correctly specified

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: adding CodeRabbitAI configuration file. It directly corresponds to the .coderabbit.yaml file introduction in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

.coderabbit.yaml (3)

59-150: Comprehensive tool enablement across 40+ linters and analyzers.

All tools are enabled by default, providing broad coverage for code quality and security. While thorough, this may increase PR review processing time and resource consumption. Consider monitoring performance metrics and disabling tools not relevant to your technology stack if needed in the future.

---

159-180: Knowledge base relies on defaults rather than explicit customization.

Lines 159–180 enable knowledge base features but leave configurations minimal:

• code_guidelines.filePatterns is empty (will use well-known defaults like .cursorrules, .github/copilot-instructions.md)
• jira.project_keys and linear.team_keys are empty (integrations will auto-discover based on repo context)
• learnings and issues scopes are set to auto

This is acceptable for initial setup. Consider populating these fields as your team's patterns and integrations become clearer.

---

181-186: Code generation path instructions are empty.

Lines 181–186 configure docstring and unit test generation but leave path_instructions arrays empty. This means generation will use CodeRabbit's defaults for all files. If your codebase has specific conventions (e.g., JSDoc vs. TSDoc), adding path-specific instructions can improve generation quality.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 584cd25 and 7c841e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: build-pr
• GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
• GitHub Check: e2e_tests (ci)
• GitHub Check: e2e_tests (azure)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.coderabbit.yaml (2)

1-186: Configuration file is well-structured and schema-compliant.

The file properly implements the CodeRabbit configuration schema with all required fields correctly typed and formatted. The YAML structure is sound, and all enum values (e.g., profile: chill, mode: warning) are valid against the schema.

---

29-29: Note: poem is intentionally disabled.

Line 29 sets poem: false, which differs from the schema default of true. This is a deliberate choice and acceptable, though it removes a creative flourish from the walkthrough comments.