LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests #724

tisnik · 2025-10-28T08:36:31Z

Description

LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests

Type of change

Related Tickets & Documents

Related Issue #LCORE-740

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests
- Standardized type annotations across the test suite to improve code quality and maintainability with enhanced type safety support.

coderabbitai · 2025-10-28T08:36:43Z

Walkthrough

This PR adds explicit -> None return type annotations to test function signatures across the quota test suite. All changes are signature-level only, with no modifications to test logic, assertions, or control flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Type annotation additions to quota test suite `tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py`, `tests/unit/quota/test_connect_pg.py`, `tests/unit/quota/test_connect_sqlite.py`, `tests/unit/quota/test_quota_exceed_error.py`, `tests/unit/quota/test_quota_limiter_factory.py`, `tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py`	Added explicit `-> None` return type annotations to test function signatures across all six test files in the quota module. Test body logic remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Homogeneous changes applied uniformly across six test files
Purely cosmetic annotation additions with no behavioral impact
Repetitive pattern (same annotation applied to all test functions)

Possibly related PRs

LCORE-740: more type hints in tests #659: Implements identical return type annotation additions across the broader test suite.
LCORE-741: Rest of unit tests #708: Modifies the same test files and functions that now receive type annotations in this PR.
LCORE-741: unit tests for quota limiter factory #706: Introduces or modifies test functions that are later annotated with return types in this PR.

Poem

🐰 Return types, declared and clear,
None shall pass without a tier,
Type hints hop through test-land bright,
Static checks see all just right! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests" accurately and concisely describes the main change in the changeset. The raw summary confirms that all modifications across the multiple test files involve adding explicit return type annotations (-> None) to test functions, with no behavioral changes. The title correctly identifies both the nature of the change (type hints) and the scope (quota limiters unit tests), making it clear and specific enough for a developer scanning the repository history to understand the primary purpose of this changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d347b1 and 49f25ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py (8 hunks)
tests/unit/quota/test_connect_pg.py (2 hunks)
tests/unit/quota/test_connect_sqlite.py (2 hunks)
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_exceed_error.py (1 hunks)
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_limiter_factory.py (11 hunks)
tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py (8 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (3)

**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

**/*.py: All modules start with descriptive module-level docstrings explaining purpose
Use logger = logging.getLogger(name) for module logging after import logging
Define type aliases at module level for clarity
All functions require docstrings with brief descriptions
Provide complete type annotations for all function parameters and return types
Use typing_extensions.Self in model validators where appropriate
Use modern union syntax (str | int) and Optional[T] or T | None consistently
Function names use snake_case with descriptive, action-oriented prefixes (get_, validate_, check_)
Avoid in-place parameter modification; return new data structures instead of mutating arguments
Use appropriate logging levels: debug, info, warning, error with clear messages
All classes require descriptive docstrings explaining purpose
Class names use PascalCase with conventional suffixes (Configuration, Error/Exception, Resolver, Interface)
Abstract base classes should use abc.ABC and @AbstractMethod for interfaces
Provide complete type annotations for all class attributes
Follow Google Python docstring style for modules, classes, and functions, including Args, Returns, Raises, Attributes sections as needed

Files:

tests/unit/quota/test_connect_pg.py
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_exceed_error.py
tests/unit/quota/test_connect_sqlite.py
tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py
tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_limiter_factory.py

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests
Do not use unittest in tests; pytest is the standard

Files:

tests/unit/quota/test_connect_pg.py
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_exceed_error.py
tests/unit/quota/test_connect_sqlite.py
tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py
tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_limiter_factory.py

tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/**/*.py: Use pytest-mock to create AsyncMock objects for async interactions in tests
Use the shared auth mock constant: MOCK_AUTH = ("mock_user_id", "mock_username", False, "mock_token") in tests

Files:

tests/unit/quota/test_connect_pg.py
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_exceed_error.py
tests/unit/quota/test_connect_sqlite.py
tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py
tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py
tests/unit/quota/test_quota_limiter_factory.py

🧬 Code graph analysis (2)

tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py (1)

tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py (8)

test_connected (38-44)

test_init_quota (47-59)

test_available_quota (62-73)

test_consume_tokens (76-102)

test_increase_quota (105-124)

test_ensure_available_quota (127-137)

test_ensure_available_quota_no_quota (140-151)

test_revoke_quota (154-173)

tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py (1)

tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py (8)

test_connected (38-44)

test_init_quota (47-57)

test_available_quota (60-71)

test_consume_tokens (74-100)

test_increase_quota (103-122)

test_ensure_available_quota (125-135)

test_ensure_available_quota_no_quota (138-149)

test_revoke_quota (152-171)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

GitHub Check: build-pr
GitHub Check: e2e_tests (azure)
GitHub Check: e2e_tests (ci)

🔇 Additional comments (6)

tests/unit/quota/test_cluster_quota_limiter.py (1)

38-38: Excellent addition of explicit return type annotations.

The explicit -> None return types improve type safety and align with the coding guidelines requirement for complete type annotations.

Also applies to: 47-47, 62-62, 76-76, 105-105, 127-127, 140-140, 154-154

tests/unit/quota/test_quota_exceed_error.py (1)

8-8: LGTM!

The explicit -> None return type annotation is correct and follows best practices.

tests/unit/quota/test_connect_sqlite.py (1)

11-11: LGTM!

The explicit -> None return type annotations improve type safety and code consistency.

Also applies to: 20-20

tests/unit/quota/test_connect_pg.py (1)

12-12: LGTM!

The explicit -> None return type annotations are correct and follow the coding guidelines.

Also applies to: 27-27

tests/unit/quota/test_user_quota_limiter.py (1)

38-38: Excellent work adding explicit return type annotations.

All -> None return types are correct and improve the type safety of the test suite.

Also applies to: 47-47, 60-60, 74-74, 103-103, 125-125, 138-138, 152-152

tests/unit/quota/test_quota_limiter_factory.py (1)

17-17: LGTM!

All explicit -> None return type annotations are correctly applied and improve the type coverage of the test suite. The multi-line signatures maintain good readability.

Also applies to: 27-27, 38-38, 49-49, 60-60, 71-73, 95-95, 115-117, 139-139, 159-159, 189-189

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

tisnik added 2 commits October 28, 2025 09:35

Type hints for quota limiters unit tests

c42f80f

Type hints for quota limiters unit tests

49f25ce

tisnik merged commit 0b873a4 into lightspeed-core:main Oct 28, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests #724

LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests #724

Uh oh!

tisnik commented Oct 28, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests #724

LCORE-740: type hints for quota limiters unit tests #724

Uh oh!

Conversation

tisnik commented Oct 28, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Type of change

Related Tickets & Documents

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

tisnik commented Oct 28, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025 •

edited

Loading