Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Jul 24, 2025

Description

LCORE-381: Unit tests for extract mcp headers

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-381

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive unit tests for MCP headers utility functions, covering various valid and invalid scenarios for header extraction and dependency handling.
  • Style

    • Improved consistency in documentation by capitalizing "MCP" in function docstrings.
    • Renamed function parameter for clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The parameter name in the mcp_headers_dependency function was changed from _request to request for clarity and consistency, with a minor docstring update. Additionally, a new unit test module was introduced, providing comprehensive tests for both extract_mcp_headers and mcp_headers_dependency, covering various input scenarios including valid, empty, and invalid header cases.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/utils/mcp_headers.py Renamed function parameter _request to request in mcp_headers_dependency; docstring updated for capitalization.
tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py Added comprehensive unit tests for extract_mcp_headers and mcp_headers_dependency, covering empty, valid, and invalid MCP header scenarios.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

In the warren of headers, a name did shift,
From underscore hidden, to clarity’s gift.
Now tested with vigor, each header and case,
The code hops ahead with a confident pace.
With every request, and each token in tow,
The rabbit approves—onward we go! 🐇✨
"""

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7aa1107 and 34ffc3c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py (1)

95-115: Remove duplicate test case.

The tests test_mcp_headers_dependency_empty_headers and test_mcp_headers_dependency_mcp_headers_empty appear to test the same scenario (empty MCP-HEADERS header). Consider removing one of these duplicate tests to avoid redundancy.

Apply this diff to remove the duplicate test:

-@pytest.mark.asyncio
-async def test_mcp_headers_dependency_empty_headers():
-    """Test the mcp_headers_dependency function for request with empty MCP-HEADERS header."""
-    request = Mock(spec=Request)
-    # empty MCP-HEADERS
-    request.headers = {"MCP-HEADERS": ""}
-
-    # empty dict should be returned
-    result = await mcp_headers.mcp_headers_dependency(request)
-    assert result == {}
-
-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc6de6b and 1a59a06.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/utils/mcp_headers.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Python linter
tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py

[error] 4-4: pylint C0411: standard import "unittest.mock.Mock" should be placed before third party import "fastapi.Request" (wrong-import-order)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-pr
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/utils/mcp_headers.py (2)

15-16: Good improvement to parameter naming and docstring consistency.

Renaming the parameter from _request to request removes the misleading underscore prefix that typically indicates unused parameters. Since this parameter is actually used in the function, this change improves code readability and consistency.


26-26: Correctly updated function call to use renamed parameter.

The function call properly uses the renamed request parameter, maintaining existing functionality while improving consistency.

tests/unit/utils/test_mcp_headers.py (8)

10-17: Good edge case coverage for empty headers.

This test properly covers the scenario where no headers are present in the request, which is an important edge case for the MCP headers extraction functionality.


20-28: Comprehensive edge case testing for empty MCP-HEADERS.

This test effectively covers the scenario where the MCP-HEADERS header is present but contains an empty string, ensuring robust handling of this edge case.


31-40: Effective positive test case for single MCP header.

This test validates the core functionality with a realistic single MCP server configuration, ensuring proper JSON parsing and data structure handling.


43-58: Thorough testing of multiple MCP headers scenario.

This test effectively validates the parsing of multiple MCP server configurations, which is likely a common real-world use case. The JSON construction and validation are well-implemented.


61-69: Good error handling test for malformed JSON.

This test ensures that invalid JSON in the MCP-HEADERS header is handled gracefully, returning an empty dictionary instead of throwing an exception.


72-80: Effective type validation testing.

This test ensures that valid JSON with incorrect type (array instead of dictionary) is properly handled by returning an empty dictionary, demonstrating good input validation.


83-91: Comprehensive type validation with null value testing.

This test covers the edge case of null JSON values, ensuring robust type validation and consistent error handling behavior.


118-183: Comprehensive async test coverage.

The remaining async tests provide excellent coverage for the mcp_headers_dependency function, ensuring it behaves consistently with the synchronous extract_mcp_headers function across all scenarios including valid inputs, invalid JSON, and type validation.

@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the lcore-381-unit-tests-for-extract-mcp-headers branch from 1a59a06 to 7aa1107 Compare July 24, 2025 08:49
@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the lcore-381-unit-tests-for-extract-mcp-headers branch from 7aa1107 to 34ffc3c Compare July 24, 2025 08:52
@tisnik tisnik merged commit e49dcd5 into lightspeed-core:main Jul 24, 2025
17 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2025
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant