Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency eslint-plugin-import to ^2.17.1 #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2019

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 13, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change References
eslint-plugin-import dependencies minor ^2.16.0 -> ^2.17.1 source

Release Notes

benmosher/eslint-plugin-import

v2.17.1

Compare Source

Fixed
  • require v2.4 of eslint-module-utils ([#​1322])

v2.17.0

Compare Source

Added
  • Autofixer for [no-duplicates] rule ([#​1312], thanks [@​lydell])
  • [no-useless-path-segments]: Add noUselessIndex option ([#​1290], thanks [@​timkraut])
  • [no-duplicates]: Add autofix ([#​1312], thanks [@​lydell])
  • Add [no-unused-modules] rule ([#​1142], thanks [@​rfermann])
  • support export type named exports from typescript ([#​1304], thanks [@​bradennapier] and [@​schmod])
Fixed
  • [order]: Fix interpreting some external modules being interpreted as internal modules ([#​793], [#​794] thanks [@​ephys])
  • allow aliases that start with @​ to be "internal" ([#​1293], [#​1294], thanks [@​jeffshaver])
  • aliased internal modules that look like core modules ([#​1297], thanks [@​echenley])
  • [namespace]: add check for null ExportMap ([#​1235], [#​1144], thanks [@​ljqx])
  • [ExportMap] fix condition for checking if block comment ([#​1234], [#​1233], thanks [@​ljqx])
  • Fix overwriting of dynamic import() CallExpression ([no-cycle], [no-relative-parent-import], [no-unresolved], [no-useless-path-segments]) ([#​1218], [#​1166], [#​1035], thanks [@​vikr01])
  • [export]: false positives for typescript type + value export ([#​1319], thanks [@​bradzacher])
  • [export]: Support typescript namespaces ([#​1320], [#​1300], thanks [@​bradzacher])
Docs
  • Update readme for Typescript ([#​1256], [#​1277], thanks [@​kirill-konshin])
  • make rule names consistent ([#​1112], thanks [@​feychenie])
Tests
  • fix broken tests on master ([#​1295], thanks [@​jeffshaver] and [@​ljharb])
  • [no-commonjs]: add tests that show corner cases ([#​1308], thanks [@​TakeScoop])

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #98 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop    #98   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage      100%   100%           
======================================
  Files            1      1           
  Lines            1      1           
======================================
  Hits             1      1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bd93695...a80c2d8. Read the comment docs.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency eslint-plugin-import to ^2.17.0 Update dependency eslint-plugin-import to ^2.17.1 Apr 13, 2019
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the feature/renovate-eslint-plugin-import-2.x branch from 584c3b0 to a80c2d8 Compare April 13, 2019 15:46
@eaviles eaviles merged commit d8864bf into develop Apr 15, 2019
@renovate renovate bot deleted the feature/renovate-eslint-plugin-import-2.x branch April 15, 2019 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants