-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Favicon for LMU Munich #365
Comments
The icons for all institutes seem to be the same so I will only add one icon (for both the Can you please confirm that you posted the signing domains, e.g. that mails from Note that unless you are aware that some mails from |
@lieser Many thanks for your super-quick response.
|
Thanks for the additional information. A note about DMARC: |
I'm aware, that |
But if the mails are not signed, then the favicon is not shown, correct? Is it possible to show the icon only for those domains that are explicitly mentioned in my first comment above, and exclude all other subdomains for now? |
Correct, the favicon will only be shown, if there's a valid dkim signature. As far as I know, the favicon depends on the signing domain, not the mail domain. If the SDID matches exactly or there's a base domain in the database, the corresponding favicon will be shown. (i.e. The comment about unsigned sub domains is also important for the default rules added. |
Although that is correct, if we don't want an icon to be shown for e.g.
That is correct. There is also no current way to explicitly exclude a sub-domain from getting an icon. Just overwriting is possible. And would only match on the exact sub-domain, and not a sub-domain of it (e.g.
No this is currently not possible. But if we have a use case for it it should maybe be implemented as part of #107.
I agree that this looks similar to the email provider example (e.g. GMX). But I think this is a little more in the Grey area. And not something there a clear policy exist for so far. E.g. both Let me elaborate a little why I think this is different from an email provider:
I'm personally undecided how we should handle this. And if we want/need to establish a clear policy for it or decide it case by case. As a reference, I recently wrote down some high level guidelines for favicon in https://github.com/lieser/dkim_verifier/wiki/Contribute#additional-requirements-for-favicon. |
Well, it's up to you @lieser... I guess we won't be able to get all sub domains for students at the LMU. |
The icon and rules are now added for I decided to add the But please let me know if anyone has concerns with that decision, and thinks that students will be to easily confused as doing official communication on behalf of the university. |
Many thanks for this wonderful tool to make the mail system safer!
It would be nice to include the icons for LMU Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) and some of its institutes:
lmu.de -> https://www.ifi.lmu.de/favicon.ico
ifi.lmu.de -> https://www.ifi.lmu.de/favicon.ico
sosy.ifi.lmu.de -> https://www.ifi.lmu.de/favicon.ico
sosy-lab.org -> https://www.sosy-lab.org/favicon.ico
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: