Skip to content

chore(release): open dev at 2.77.0 before releasing 2.76.0 - #6462

Merged
lidge-jun merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/dev-version-2.77.0
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

lidge-jun merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/dev-version-2.77.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

2.76.0 is about to be released. Merging this first means dev already outranks the new tag when it lands, so neither dev nor any open pull request ever inherits the version-line failure. release.yml refuses to publish until this has merged.

This moves dev to 2.77.0 in package.json and the desktop version
sources (tauri.conf.json, Cargo.toml, and the opencodex-desktop entry of Cargo.lock).

Opened automatically by .github/workflows/dev-version-bump.yml. The same
version-line move was previously done by hand in 32529c2, e4a85d1, 076ad30, and
befcac3.

Verification

The workflow proved 2.76.0 has neither a Git tag nor an npm publication, and bun test tests/ci-workflows/release-version-line.test.ts proved the chosen development version is unused.

Checklist

  • Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
  • Docs or release notes were updated when needed.
  • Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

Review readiness checklist

This PR stays in draft until every box below is ticked. Tick all four boxes once the requirements are met:

  • Required local validation passed; commands, results, and any full-suite exception are documented.

  • I pushed my PR to a recent dev commit (at most 10 behind; a maintainer may still ask for the exact tip before merge).

  • I resolved all correct Codex and CodeRabbit findings.

  • My PR is ready for review.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: lidge-jun/opencodex/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: dd6f14c7-d554-4079-8ea0-97e5a7996d7c

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⏳ DRAFT

  • hygiene: unsponsored_surface.

What to do

  • Fix unsponsored_surface — This changes an authentication, workflow, release-automation, or dependency surface. MAINTAINERS.md requires security review for these; ask a maintainer to apply maintainer-sponsored once they have reviewed it. Paths: package.json.
  • Tick all four boxes in the PR description once you're done (currently 0/4).

Review readiness checklist

  • ⬜ Required local validation passed; commands, results, and any full-suite exception are documented.
  • ⬜ I pushed my PR to a recent dev commit (at most 10 behind; a maintainer may still ask for the exact tip before merge).
  • ⬜ I resolved all correct Codex and CodeRabbit findings.
  • ⬜ My PR is ready for review.

0/4 boxes ticked.

Automatic draft conversion failed (token cannot change draft status). Please convert this pull request to a draft manually. The required enforce-target check will keep failing until every issue above is resolved.

@github-actions
github-actions Bot marked this pull request as draft October 2, 2026 14:22
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2026 16:55
@lidge-jun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Maintainer integration into dev by @lidge-jun: release pre-move for 2.76.0 (MAINTAINERS.md). The diff is exactly the four version sources, each 2.76.0 -> 2.77.0.

  • Release candidate frozen at dev e0af52c, whose workflow_dispatch Cross-platform CI 37012309480 and Service lifecycle 37012313136 succeeded.
  • Exact-head checks on b95041c: Cross-platform CI 37019312393 success (21 jobs, 7 path skips), Service lifecycle 37019312400 success, React Doctor 37019312449 success, CodeRabbit success. The runs needed manual approval because the PR was bot-authored.
  • Merging now so release.yml's preflight sees dev outranking 2.76.0 before the preview and stable publishes.

@lidge-jun
lidge-jun merged commit b4616be into dev Oct 2, 2026
35 checks passed
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun deleted the codex/dev-version-2.77.0 branch October 2, 2026 16:55
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-02T16:57:21.507807Z b95041c Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

devin-ai-integration Bot added a commit to luvs01/opencodex that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2026
Adds 035_release_2_76_0.md (promotions lidge-jun#6467/lidge-jun#6468, Release runs
37041498025/37047146196, both tags published 25 assets) and
080_wave_1002_tail.md (lidge-jun#6448 OpenGateway preset, lidge-jun#6462 dev-open).
Window extended to 10-02 16:55 UTC; totals updated to 81 first-parent
commits, 68 uncovered merges, 4 release rounds.

Co-Authored-By: Epinephrine <luvs01@hanmail.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant