Skip to content

test(update): expose detached recovery failure evidence - #3623

Merged
lidge-jun merged 3 commits into
devfrom
codex/260905-dev-ci-restart-diagnostics
Sep 5, 2026
Merged

lidge-jun merged 3 commits into
devfrom
codex/260905-dev-ci-restart-diagnostics

Conversation

@lidge-jun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Captures the evidence missing from the actual Linux 4/4 update-restart failure in final dev run 33943525788. Only the copied test launcher is instrumented: owner-only temporary files record the detached child output and exit status; readiness failure emits bounded allowlisted categories, source frames and runtime-file presence.

This does not claim a production fix yet. The original assertions, time budgets, real restart and teardown are unchanged. Raw output, tokens and request bodies are not printed.

Stack: depends on #3622; merge bottom-up, then inspect the final dev run.

Verification

  • Worker static validation passed; no local tests or launcher execution.
  • Exact failure evidence: job 101246770910, waitForProxy false after 91,864.70 ms.
  • Production bin/ocx.mjs is unchanged; instrumentation applies only to the fixture copy.
  • Next hosted dev CI must either pass or supply the missing failure evidence.

Checklist

  • Diagnostics limited to one existing failing test.
  • No timeout inflation, skipped assertions or fake successful server.
  • Output and temporary-file permissions bounded.

jun added 3 commits September 5, 2026 13:22
…ctations

Fix concrete final-dev Linux shards 1/4 and 2/4 failures at 55395a9. Keep lazy namespace dispatch, declare the existing endpoint and CLI verb, regenerate the capability surface, and retain the new observation timestamp in the existing exact-object regression. No local tests run; hosted Linux rerun is the execution gate.
Fix the real Linux 3/4 and macOS failure: the activation fixture wrote an HTTP URL that production config validation correctly rejected. Keep a valid synthetic HTTPS config and adapt only its transport to the real loopback receiver; restore fetch after the test. No production policy weakening and no local test execution.
Instrument only the copied launcher: preserve the real detached restart while capturing owner-only stdout/stderr and child exit records. Emit allowlisted bounded diagnostics on the existing readiness failure without changing budgets, expectations, or teardown. Static checks only; no local tests or live launcher execution.
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun requested a review from Ingwannu as a code owner September 5, 2026 04:31
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (2)
  • ^dev$
  • ^preview$

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: e5fdec98-5cf3-452c-89eb-29aed325072f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-09-05T04:32:05.624624Z 1f62b97 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the chore Maintenance, CI, tests, refactors, or build changes (not a user-facing bug or feature). label Sep 5, 2026
Base automatically changed from codex/260905-dev-ci-quota-route to dev September 5, 2026 04:31
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun changed the base branch from codex/260905-dev-ci-quota-route to dev September 5, 2026 04:31
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

@lidge-jun
lidge-jun merged commit 1c1ca06 into dev Sep 5, 2026
19 of 27 checks passed
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun deleted the codex/260905-dev-ci-restart-diagnostics branch September 5, 2026 04:32
agentHits pushed a commit to agentHits/opencodex that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2026
Owner-authorized diagnostic follow-up for the actual Linux restart failure. Only the fixture launcher is instrumented; production behavior, assertions and time budgets unchanged. Raw output redacted. No local tests; next dev HEAD CI is the execution gate.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

chore Maintenance, CI, tests, refactors, or build changes (not a user-facing bug or feature).

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant