Repository navigation
docs(devlog): record the v2.28.0 release and its CI evidence #2192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
74 changes: 74 additions & 0 deletions
74
devlog/_plan/260820_bug_pr_backlog_consolidation/120_release_2280.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ | ||
| # 120 — v2.28.0 release | ||
|
|
||
| Unit: 260820_bug_pr_backlog_consolidation | ||
|
|
||
| Published: `@bitkyc08/opencodex@2.28.0` as npm `latest`. | ||
|
|
||
| | Artifact | Value | | ||
| |---|---| | ||
| | Release commit | `584059132` (main) | | ||
| | Tag | `v2.28.0` → `5840591322117f3ee9568b35b135a6d4339f7711` | | ||
| | GitHub release | `v2.28.0`, 2026-08-20T09:17:50Z | | ||
| | Release workflow | run `32355161140`, **success**, head `584059132` | | ||
| | npm dist-tags | `latest: 2.28.0` | | ||
| | preview line | `2.28.0-preview.20260820` at `d2c700c1a` | | ||
|
|
||
| ## The CI stability claim, as measured rather than asserted | ||
|
|
||
| The release gate in `release.yml` is deliberately narrow: it requires a **successful push-event | ||
| `ci.yml` run for the exact release SHA on the release branch**. A PR run for the same SHA does | ||
| not qualify, because it ran against a merge ref under a different trigger context. | ||
|
|
||
| That gate was met: `main` push-event CI is **success at `584059132`** — the exact commit the | ||
| tag points at. | ||
|
|
||
| **`dev` CI is red at `96f288d59`, and that was checked rather than waved past.** The failures | ||
| are Windows-only: | ||
|
|
||
| - `windows 1/4`: WP13 composed `E` (54,074 ms) and `Restore truth` (45,197 ms). | ||
| - `windows 2/4`: journal-ownership start/ensure, and CL-10 deterministic bundle failing inside | ||
| `publishPrivateFileExclusive` on a `D:\` path. | ||
|
|
||
| Every non-Windows job in that same run succeeded. The Windows leg is `workflow_dispatch`-only | ||
| by design and is explicitly excluded from the release gate — `ci.yml:544-546` states that | ||
| `release.yml` gates on Linux + macOS + gates, and that "Windows re-enters the gate when the | ||
| tracked failures are fixed, not before" (issue #1059). These are the pre-existing failures | ||
| #2152 catalogues, not a regression from this range. | ||
|
|
||
| So: **not a green Windows leg, and not claimed as one.** The release shipped on the gate the | ||
| repository actually defines, with the red leg named and attributed. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Two things the release helper caught that a manual publish would not have | ||
|
|
||
| **The local gate failed on missing GUI dependencies, not on a defect.** The first run failed 7 | ||
| tests with `Cannot find package 'react'`. CI installs twice — root and then `gui/` — and builds | ||
| the GUI, because tests that fetch the served dashboard read their session bootstrap out of | ||
| `gui/dist/index.html`. The `ci.yml` comment at line 280 predicts this exact failure. After | ||
| `cd gui && bun install` plus `bun run build`, the gate passed and the publish proceeded. | ||
|
|
||
| **The helper is re-entrant and it proved it.** A later re-run refused with "release version | ||
| 2.28.0 is already partially or fully used", listing npm, the remote tag, and the GitHub release. | ||
| That is the metadata preflight working as intended: it is what turned an ambiguous "did that | ||
| publish land?" into a verified yes, and it is why the second attempt could not double-publish. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Verification performed | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| npm view @bitkyc08/opencodex version -> 2.28.0 | ||
| npm view ... dist-tags -> latest: 2.28.0 | ||
| git tag -l v2.28.0 -> v2.28.0 | ||
| gh release view v2.28.0 -> present | ||
| git merge-base --is-ancestor 584059132 origin/main -> YES | ||
| gh run view 32355161140 -> success @ 584059132 | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| A pushed commit and a dispatched workflow were not treated as a completed release; each artifact | ||
| above was read back from its own authority. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Not done | ||
|
|
||
| The preview channel carries `2.28.0-preview.20260820` as a commit, but npm `dist-tags.preview` | ||
| still reads `2.26.0-preview.20260819` — that channel has not been published. Its CI was still | ||
| in progress at `d2c700c1a`. Stable was the release under authorization; the preview publish is | ||
| a separate decision. | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Resolve the Markdown lint violations.
Line 36 starts with
#2152, which Markdown parses as an invalid ATX heading. WriteIssue#2152`` or wrap the issue number in code.Line 56 starts a fenced block without a language. Use
consolebecause the block contains commands and command output.Proposed fix
Static analysis reports MD018 on Line 36 and MD040 on Line 56.
Also applies to: 56-56
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.23.2)
[warning] 36-36: No space after hash on atx style heading
(MD018, no-missing-space-atx)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Source: Linters/SAST tools