-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
feat(gossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fn
#4285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(gossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fn
#4285
Conversation
gossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fngossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fn
dad2f69 to
a8365dd
Compare
gossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fngossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fn
gossipsub): remove fast_message_id_fnfast_message_id_fn
thomaseizinger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! I've had a first look.
This will be a breaking change so we'll park it for now until we decide to do another round of breaking changes.
thomaseizinger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Can you write a changelog entry please and bump the minor version of libp2p-gossipsub?
1276cdc to
a0e110d
Compare
70b971a to
014bcb9
Compare
|
Can you look into the CI failures? The version bumps seem to be faulty! |
014bcb9 to
877d3f4
Compare
|
Ah sorry... forgot about the main Cargo file |
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @StemCll? 🙏 |
877d3f4 to
d26a807
Compare
|
I am changing this to draft to make it clear that it should not be merged yet because it is a breaking change. |
mxinden
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @StemCll for the work!
@AgeManning would you mind taking a look. Other then the comment below, this looks good to me.
AgeManning
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. Thanks for the help :)
d26a807 to
1ec34a4
Compare
|
@StemCll Can you deal with the CI failures please? |
|
Yes, I'll fix it tonight |
a6b7b0f to
066822d
Compare
|
@thomaseizinger there was a security issue with quinn-proto crate, thus it's updated with |
Thanks! We have a separate PR that fixes this up it shouldn't matter as the diff will cancel out :) |
thomaseizinger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
I am gonna leave this as draft until we actually merge breaking changes.
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @StemCll? 🙏 |
4e19ade to
1ad6e36
Compare
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @StemCll? 🙏 |
Approvals have been dismissed because the PR was updated after the send-it label was applied.
Description
Resolves #4138.
Change checklist