feat(report): group categories into Pixel Accuracy / Token Efficiency#225
feat(report): group categories into Pixel Accuracy / Token Efficiency#225
Conversation
… cards (#215) Replace 6 individual category gauges with 2 group cards showing bar charts per category. Display-only change — no scoring formula modification. Each group shows average score, description, and clickable category bars that navigate to the corresponding tab. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2EPyD3PhqkQFrk5BB4M4g
On mobile (<600px), hide category bar charts so both group cards fit on screen at a glance. Keep 2-column grid layout. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2EPyD3PhqkQFrk5BB4M4g
Show inline category name + percentage below group description on mobile (<600px) when bar graphs are hidden. Desktop unchanged. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2EPyD3PhqkQFrk5BB4M4g
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
244f3ea to
4298e14
Compare
|
Closing — the underlying problem (D/F grades for well-structured files) was resolved by sqrt damping (#227) instead of display-level grouping. With damping applied, per-category scores are reasonable and grouping is unnecessary. Generated by Claude Code |
Summary
Motivation
Closes #215 — users see Grade D (51%) despite 95% pixel similarity because token-related rules dominate. Grouping makes it immediately clear: "pixel accuracy is fine, token efficiency is dragging the grade."
Test plan
renderCategoryGroup)tsc --noEmitpasseshttps://claude.ai/code/session_01H2EPyD3PhqkQFrk5BB4M4g