[RFC] Add "function" as an explicit kind of output data #628
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
saqadri
requested review from
rholinshead,
suyoglastmileai,
Ankush-lastmile,
jonathanlastmileai and
rossdanlm
as code owners
This can help us distinguish function calling from regular strings quickly -- since function calling is now supported across multiple models, it deserves to be a top-level output kind in the schema. For example, current models that support it: * GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4V * Gemini * [Mixtral (using Anyscale endpoints)](https://docs.endpoints.anyscale.com/guides/function-calling/#:~:text=With%20Anyscale%20Endpoints%2C%20you%20can,parameters%20to%20pass%20to%20it.) * There will be more to come
This was referenced Dec 27, 2023
rossdanlm
reviewed
Dec 27, 2023
| name: string; | ||
| arguments: string; | ||
| [k: string]: any; | ||
| }[]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh I realize, we probably shouldn't have put a list here, will fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[RFC] Add "function" as an explicit kind of output data
This can help us distinguish function calling from regular strings quickly -- since function calling is now supported across multiple models, it deserves to be a top-level output kind in the schema.
For example, current models that support it: