Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: find runnable predecessor for every successor that is not runnable #2996

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

ogabrielluiz
Copy link
Contributor

Refactor the find_next_runnable_vertices method in the Graph class to improve readability and simplify the logic. Instead of using a list comprehension, the method now uses a for loop to iterate over the vertex_successors_ids and determine if each vertex is runnable. If a vertex is not runnable, it calls the find_runnable_predecessors_for_successor method to find the runnable predecessors. The runnable vertices are then added to the next_runnable_vertices list. This refactoring improves the clarity and maintainability of the code.

Refactor the `find_next_runnable_vertices` method in the `Graph` class to improve readability and simplify the logic. Instead of using a list comprehension, the method now uses a for loop to iterate over the `vertex_successors_ids` and determine if each vertex is runnable. If a vertex is not runnable, it calls the `find_runnable_predecessors_for_successor` method to find the runnable predecessors. The runnable vertices are then added to the `next_runnable_vertices` list. This refactoring improves the clarity and maintainability of the code.
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz enabled auto-merge (squash) July 26, 2024 20:16
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request Validation Report

This comment is automatically generated by Conventional PR

Whitelist Report

Whitelist Active Result
Pull request is a draft and should be ignored
Pull request is made by a whitelisted user and should be ignored
Pull request is submitted by a bot and should be ignored
Pull request is submitted by administrators and should be ignored

Result

Pull request does not satisfy any enabled whitelist criteria. Pull request will be validated.

Validation Report

Validation Active Result
All commits in this pull request has valid messages
Pull request does not introduce too many changes
Pull request has a valid title
Pull request has mentioned issues
Pull request has valid branch name
Pull request should have a non-empty body

Result

Pull request satisfies all enabled pull request rules.

Last Modified at 26 Jul 24 20:17 UTC

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 26, 2024
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz linked an issue Jul 26, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-2996.dmtpw4p5recq1.amplifyapp.com

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 26, 2024
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz merged commit 612b1ff into main Jul 26, 2024
59 of 60 checks passed
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz deleted the fix/findnextrunnablesuccessor branch July 26, 2024 21:14
nicoloboschi pushed a commit to datastax/ragstack-ai-langflow that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
…le (langflow-ai#2996)

* refactor: add find_runnable_predecessors_for_successor method

* feat: refactor find_next_runnable_vertices method

Refactor the `find_next_runnable_vertices` method in the `Graph` class to improve readability and simplify the logic. Instead of using a list comprehension, the method now uses a for loop to iterate over the `vertex_successors_ids` and determine if each vertex is runnable. If a vertex is not runnable, it calls the `find_runnable_predecessors_for_successor` method to find the runnable predecessors. The runnable vertices are then added to the `next_runnable_vertices` list. This refactoring improves the clarity and maintainability of the code.

(cherry picked from commit 612b1ff)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Component-Order-Issue
2 participants