Modifies frontend chatComponent to itemize validation errors #126
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Release 0.0.45
added colors to toolkits and wrappers
|
@anovazzi1 could you take a look at this one, please? |
|
sure ! |
anovazzi1
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2023
anovazzi1
reviewed
Apr 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, if a user tries to submit a chat message, but there are nodes with validation errors, they get a message reading "Please fill in all the required fields before continuing", but no explanation as to what fields are missing.
The
validateNodescheck withinchatComponentpreviously returned a boolean indicating whether any template fields have missing values.This PR changes the return value to an array of
"(node name) is missing (field name)."for any template fields with missing values. If the array has any length, it's considered to be invalid.