Pin types-rs version to the one set in lockfile

[gabrielbosio]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.570 s ±  0.013 s    [User: 24.777 s, System: 0.791 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.561 s … 25.579 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.594 s ±  0.067 s    [User: 24.816 s, System: 0.775 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.546 s … 25.641 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.264 s ±  0.014 s    [User: 24.906 s, System: 0.814 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.254 s … 14.274 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.291 s ±  0.032 s    [User: 24.945 s, System: 0.813 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.269 s … 14.314 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.418 s ±  0.046 s    [User: 37.483 s, System: 0.991 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.385 s … 10.451 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.258 s ±  0.013 s    [User: 37.532 s, System: 0.976 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.249 s … 10.267 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.02 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.466 s ±  0.026 s    [User: 37.783 s, System: 0.985 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.448 s … 10.485 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.481 s ±  0.314 s    [User: 37.763 s, System: 0.990 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.259 s … 10.703 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.00 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.152 s ±  0.124 s    [User: 38.464 s, System: 1.014 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.064 s … 10.240 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.184 s ±  0.074 s    [User: 38.456 s, System: 1.007 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.132 s … 10.236 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.351 s ±  0.084 s    [User: 38.599 s, System: 1.120 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.291 s … 10.410 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.228 s ±  0.015 s    [User: 38.689 s, System: 1.094 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.218 s … 10.238 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.119 ± 0.024	2.092	2.159	1.01 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.101 ± 0.007	2.086	2.109	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.042 ± 0.021	2.019	2.097	1.01 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.025 ± 0.006	2.017	2.035	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.764 ± 0.033	7.708	7.822	1.00 ± 0.01
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.760 ± 0.029	7.711	7.801	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.172 ± 0.019	2.156	2.222	1.02 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.140 ± 0.014	2.128	2.174	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.409 ± 0.015	1.395	1.438	1.01 ± 0.01
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.400 ± 0.005	1.393	1.409	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.222 ± 0.004	1.216	1.228	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.223 ± 0.008	1.215	1.242	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.889 ± 0.043	7.842	7.945	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.896 ± 0.092	7.806	8.057	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.066 ± 0.052	7.993	8.160	1.00 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.063 ± 0.046	7.983	8.142	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.167 ± 0.030	2.142	2.232	1.00 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.159 ± 0.010	2.140	2.173	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.487 ± 0.008	1.475	1.501	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.484 ± 0.010	1.470	1.506	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.448 ± 0.015	1.432	1.477	1.01 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.433 ± 0.005	1.424	1.441	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.210 ± 0.002	1.207	1.212	1.01 ± 0.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.200 ± 0.004	1.195	1.206	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.551 ± 0.005	1.542	1.560	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.569 ± 0.013	1.557	1.597	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	526.2 ± 0.8	525.2	527.7	1.00
head pedersen	526.9 ± 2.0	524.5	531.4	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	605.1 ± 3.9	600.5	609.6	1.01 ± 0.01
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	598.7 ± 3.4	595.6	607.1	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.815 ± 0.007	1.810	1.830	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.816 ± 0.010	1.807	1.840	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	663.2 ± 8.5	651.9	675.6	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	668.5 ± 6.6	658.3	677.1	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.285 ± 0.113	4.237	4.605	1.01 ± 0.03
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.246 ± 0.034	4.220	4.341	1.00

[FrancoGiachetta]

I would also add that types-rs was updated to 0.1.8, right?

[gabrielbosio]

Because types-rs was not pinned, it was already updated to 0.1.8 before this PR, so I am not sure this counts as a dependency update.

[FrancoGiachetta]

Oh I see

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (eb25534) to head (12c200e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2140   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.67%   96.67%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       43568    43568           
=======================================
  Hits        42118    42118           
  Misses       1450     1450           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.