Removed CODEOWNERS file

[igaray]

Description

Removes the CODEOWNERS file as the requirement for codeowner reviews for merging has been temporarily lifted.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.369 s ±  0.001 s    [User: 25.594 s, System: 0.774 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.368 s … 26.370 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.352 s ±  0.064 s    [User: 25.588 s, System: 0.763 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.307 s … 26.397 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.712 s ±  0.069 s    [User: 25.753 s, System: 0.806 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.663 s … 14.760 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.685 s ±  0.017 s    [User: 25.686 s, System: 0.836 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.673 s … 14.696 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.350 s ±  0.095 s    [User: 38.240 s, System: 0.953 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.283 s … 10.417 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.491 s ±  0.251 s    [User: 37.764 s, System: 0.932 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.313 s … 10.669 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.623 s ±  0.023 s    [User: 37.733 s, System: 0.945 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.607 s … 10.639 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.465 s ±  0.035 s    [User: 37.971 s, System: 1.028 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.441 s … 10.490 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.02 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.444 s ±  0.159 s    [User: 38.193 s, System: 0.979 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.332 s … 10.557 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.566 s ±  0.301 s    [User: 38.282 s, System: 0.963 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.353 s … 10.779 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.406 s ±  0.149 s    [User: 38.617 s, System: 1.040 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.300 s … 10.511 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.320 s ±  0.270 s    [User: 38.560 s, System: 1.072 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.129 s … 10.511 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.115 ± 0.027	2.087	2.161	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.107 ± 0.012	2.097	2.136	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.074 ± 0.017	2.052	2.106	1.02 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.037 ± 0.017	2.020	2.065	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.663 ± 0.124	7.518	7.811	1.02 ± 0.02
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.516 ± 0.064	7.459	7.678	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.229 ± 0.036	2.201	2.324	1.02 ± 0.02
head compare_arrays_200000	2.181 ± 0.029	2.161	2.260	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.462 ± 0.009	1.453	1.483	1.02 ± 0.01
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.435 ± 0.010	1.424	1.459	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.217 ± 0.011	1.206	1.243	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.212 ± 0.005	1.204	1.221	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.630 ± 0.024	7.572	7.654	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.708 ± 0.451	7.525	8.986	1.01 ± 0.06

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.888 ± 0.037	7.853	7.976	1.01 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.830 ± 0.082	7.750	8.006	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.186 ± 0.028	2.150	2.234	1.02 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.138 ± 0.008	2.123	2.151	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.545 ± 0.014	1.529	1.573	1.03 ± 0.01
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.503 ± 0.008	1.490	1.513	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.481 ± 0.015	1.470	1.521	1.02 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.453 ± 0.015	1.443	1.493	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.235 ± 0.005	1.230	1.243	1.02 ± 0.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.209 ± 0.002	1.206	1.212	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.590 ± 0.016	1.572	1.621	1.02 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.565 ± 0.003	1.561	1.574	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	534.3 ± 2.9	530.5	540.3	1.01 ± 0.01
head pedersen	530.8 ± 2.7	528.0	536.1	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	632.0 ± 5.3	625.3	639.3	1.01 ± 0.01
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	624.4 ± 5.2	618.3	632.4	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.856 ± 0.008	1.845	1.870	1.01 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.844 ± 0.010	1.833	1.863	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	630.0 ± 3.8	625.5	638.0	1.01 ± 0.01
head set_integration_benchmark	625.3 ± 2.6	622.5	630.8	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.228 ± 0.068	4.162	4.403	1.02 ± 0.02
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.145 ± 0.019	4.119	4.182	1.00

[FrancoGiachetta]

The Run Lints job seems to be failing due to a program not being found. Perhaps we need to delete the cache and run the jobs again

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.53%. Comparing base (2723e6f) to head (bd923a6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2018   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.53%   96.53%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       42725    42725           
=======================================
  Hits        41245    41245           
  Misses       1480     1480           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.