Try to fix benchmark hyper threading ci for external contributors

[edg-l]

I think specifying the ref as head_ref tried to checkout the head using lambda repo instead of the author fork.

See https://github.com/lambdaclass/cairo-vm/actions/runs/13784962437/job/38554300107?pr=1988

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.271 s ±  0.114 s    [User: 25.519 s, System: 0.749 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.191 s … 26.351 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.224 s ±  0.013 s    [User: 25.464 s, System: 0.758 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.215 s … 26.233 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.612 s ±  0.074 s    [User: 25.693 s, System: 0.788 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.559 s … 14.664 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.560 s ±  0.096 s    [User: 25.533 s, System: 0.760 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.492 s … 14.627 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.602 s ±  0.268 s    [User: 37.482 s, System: 0.925 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.412 s … 10.792 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.738 s ±  0.257 s    [User: 37.919 s, System: 0.883 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.556 s … 10.920 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.254 s ±  0.058 s    [User: 38.442 s, System: 0.905 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.213 s … 10.295 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.676 s ±  0.106 s    [User: 37.950 s, System: 0.909 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.601 s … 10.751 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.04 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.492 s ±  0.116 s    [User: 38.502 s, System: 0.938 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.410 s … 10.573 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.373 s ±  0.210 s    [User: 38.563 s, System: 0.963 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.225 s … 10.522 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.395 s ±  0.261 s    [User: 38.852 s, System: 1.036 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.211 s … 10.580 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.560 s ±  0.019 s    [User: 38.887 s, System: 1.097 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.547 s … 10.573 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.02 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.150 ± 0.029	2.123	2.214	1.01 ± 0.02
head big_factorial	2.134 ± 0.017	2.119	2.174	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.074 ± 0.013	2.059	2.094	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.069 ± 0.021	2.052	2.122	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.809 ± 0.119	7.672	8.014	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.845 ± 0.115	7.718	8.084	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.198 ± 0.021	2.171	2.242	1.00
head compare_arrays_200000	2.201 ± 0.014	2.182	2.226	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.447 ± 0.049	1.421	1.583	1.01 ± 0.03
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.432 ± 0.005	1.426	1.440	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.229 ± 0.009	1.217	1.249	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.237 ± 0.016	1.225	1.263	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.820 ± 0.074	7.728	7.922	1.00 ± 0.01
head integration_builtins	7.799 ± 0.071	7.755	7.983	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.097 ± 0.092	8.000	8.255	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.115 ± 0.091	8.021	8.308	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.185 ± 0.014	2.171	2.208	1.01 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.174 ± 0.014	2.155	2.193	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.508 ± 0.007	1.500	1.519	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.520 ± 0.019	1.504	1.569	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.462 ± 0.004	1.457	1.468	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.467 ± 0.006	1.460	1.477	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.227 ± 0.012	1.215	1.257	1.00 ± 0.01
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.224 ± 0.011	1.214	1.244	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.573 ± 0.013	1.558	1.599	1.00 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.573 ± 0.006	1.563	1.580	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	532.8 ± 1.9	530.2	535.0	1.00
head pedersen	533.4 ± 2.8	530.6	538.0	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	633.6 ± 3.4	630.3	642.3	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	635.0 ± 5.1	629.7	644.6	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.864 ± 0.011	1.847	1.882	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.882 ± 0.022	1.867	1.942	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	629.4 ± 2.5	626.6	634.6	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	630.0 ± 2.2	627.3	633.1	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.297 ± 0.039	4.239	4.348	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.309 ± 0.064	4.236	4.419	1.00 ± 0.02

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.53%. Comparing base (5c56712) to head (a06cc3f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1996   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.53%   96.53%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       42619    42619           
=======================================
  Hits        41142    41142           
  Misses       1477     1477           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.