Migrate from pyenv to uv

[edg-l]

This migrates the python workflow from pyenv to the fast modern rust based uv.

The only takeaway is that the pypy versions you can install from uv doesn't seem to work well with the bitarray dependency we have, as it fails to compile. As pypy was only used in run_benchmarks.sh, which was an outdated script that we no longer used, I also removed it.

I also tried to update python to 3.13.2 but cairo-run doesnt work well, however cairo-compile does work well. In the end I kept the old python version 3.9.

[edg-l]

The non-required ci workflow Benchmark Hyper Threading / benchmark (pull_request) fails because main doesnt use uv yet

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.142 ± 0.014	2.124	2.176	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.135 ± 0.021	2.115	2.185	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.071 ± 0.012	2.056	2.091	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.066 ± 0.006	2.059	2.075	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.874 ± 0.100	7.781	8.143	1.00 ± 0.01
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.845 ± 0.042	7.794	7.918	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.194 ± 0.025	2.170	2.245	1.01 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.180 ± 0.009	2.160	2.190	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.413 ± 0.008	1.404	1.433	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.422 ± 0.014	1.412	1.459	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.239 ± 0.020	1.227	1.295	1.00 ± 0.02
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.237 ± 0.007	1.223	1.246	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.919 ± 0.044	7.853	7.990	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.937 ± 0.043	7.861	8.021	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.107 ± 0.067	8.045	8.255	1.01 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.060 ± 0.028	8.007	8.102	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.151 ± 0.009	2.137	2.171	1.00
head linear_search	2.173 ± 0.020	2.146	2.207	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.497 ± 0.013	1.480	1.525	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.510 ± 0.016	1.490	1.538	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.446 ± 0.010	1.432	1.463	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.462 ± 0.009	1.453	1.484	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.213 ± 0.005	1.206	1.224	1.00 ± 0.01
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.208 ± 0.004	1.200	1.215	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.571 ± 0.007	1.558	1.580	1.00 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.568 ± 0.011	1.554	1.597	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	529.9 ± 2.2	525.9	533.0	1.00
head pedersen	530.8 ± 2.3	528.4	536.3	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	622.1 ± 5.5	614.2	631.9	1.00 ± 0.01
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	619.5 ± 5.4	613.1	630.4	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.819 ± 0.016	1.804	1.858	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.831 ± 0.018	1.814	1.876	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	672.0 ± 7.6	661.0	682.4	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	672.7 ± 11.3	657.3	685.1	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.271 ± 0.018	4.243	4.302	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.289 ± 0.010	4.278	4.306	1.00 ± 0.00

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (d78fcfa) to head (b8ea96d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1995   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.67%   96.67%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       43568    43568           
=======================================
  Hits        42118    42118           
  Misses       1450     1450           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gabrielbosio]

@edg-l I would consider to keep pyenv for now as an alternative if uv is not installed (I'm following #1754 as a reference). We can print a message with something like pyenv is deprecated if that's the case.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.655 s ±  0.032 s    [User: 24.876 s, System: 0.777 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.633 s … 25.678 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.708 s ±  0.182 s    [User: 24.877 s, System: 0.828 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.579 s … 25.836 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.341 s ±  0.038 s    [User: 25.081 s, System: 0.813 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.314 s … 14.368 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.291 s ±  0.015 s    [User: 24.973 s, System: 0.815 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.280 s … 14.301 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.383 s ±  0.366 s    [User: 37.782 s, System: 0.966 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.124 s … 10.641 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.799 s ±  0.041 s    [User: 37.378 s, System: 0.992 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.770 s … 10.828 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.04 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.548 s ±  0.136 s    [User: 37.789 s, System: 1.010 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.452 s … 10.645 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.431 s ±  0.039 s    [User: 37.449 s, System: 1.002 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.404 s … 10.458 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.415 s ±  0.297 s    [User: 38.175 s, System: 1.000 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.205 s … 10.625 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.322 s ±  0.054 s    [User: 38.050 s, System: 1.042 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.284 s … 10.361 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.384 s ±  0.104 s    [User: 38.531 s, System: 1.076 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.311 s … 10.458 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.154 s ±  0.036 s    [User: 38.633 s, System: 1.071 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.128 s … 10.180 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[JulianGCalderon]

I squashed the commits because we had a unsigned commit in the history, and I encountered conflicts while trying to rebase all commits.