Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

integration: add input method section #49

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tokyo4j
Copy link
Contributor

@tokyo4j tokyo4j commented Mar 10, 2024

Intended for merging after 0.17.2 0.7.2 is released.
As I'm a non-native English speaker, any nitpicking is welcome.

src/integration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Consolatis
Copy link
Member

Looks really nice, thanks for the excellent write up.
I will try to test this in the coming weeks to get a feel of how it works and what potential pitfalls we may see in the future.

@johanmalm
Copy link
Contributor

@tokyo4j Now that 0.17.2 is out, shall we merge this?

@johanmalm
Copy link
Contributor

Intended for merging after 0.17.2 is released.

What is the reference here... wlroots 0.17.2 or labwc 0.7.2?
If it's wlroots 0.17.2, what's the commit we depend on out of curiosity?

src/integration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tokyo4j
Copy link
Contributor Author

tokyo4j commented Mar 23, 2024

Oh, what a stupid mistake... I meant 0.7.2. Sorry for confusion!

src/integration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/integration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Consolatis
Copy link
Member

One last small nitpick above, other than that this LGTM, I'd vote for the squash-and-merge once the last nitpick is resolved.

@tokyo4j tokyo4j marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2024 09:16
@Consolatis Consolatis merged commit 3c0ad00 into labwc:main Mar 25, 2024
@Consolatis
Copy link
Member

Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants