-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BPF CO-RE Changes #83
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just one quick question
@@ -32,6 +32,18 @@ typedef struct flow_record_ { | |||
u16 counter; /* flow_idle_counter */ | |||
} flow_record_t; | |||
|
|||
void *memset(void *b, int c, unsigned long len) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we adding this? I don't see a reference to it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This Function is Present in <string.h> which we are not including hence I have implemented this function, when I am including <string.h> in our bpf Program it is creating lot of compilation issues.
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
Can we keep connection limit code to work in window env, without BPF-CORE. Need to support both modes |
Signed-off-by: Atul-source <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
In this PR I have made the changes to eBPF Programs to support BPF CO-RE (Compile Once Run Everywhere).
This PR address #28 .
PR for Payload Changes: 110