Fix feature gate description/phase mismatches for decentralizedLiveMigration and incrementalBackup - #4463
Conversation
|
Hi @hmeir. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Hi @hmeir. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubevirt member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
🔗 Linked repositories identifiedCodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated preview maturity labels for Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsLinked repositories: Your configuration references 13 linked repositories, but your current plan allows 10. Analyzed Linked repositories: Public OSS repositories can only analyze public repositories installed in this organization. Analyzed Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
/ok-to-test |
Coverage Report for CI Build 30542681432Warning Build has drifted: This PR's base is out of sync with its target branch, so coverage data may include unrelated changes. Coverage remained the same at 85.618%Details
Uncovered ChangesNo uncovered changes found. Coverage RegressionsNo coverage regressions found. Coverage Stats
💛 - Coveralls |
|
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@hmeir thanks for this PR! please notice that should not change the featureGates field comment in v1. It is auto generated from Please don't forget to run |
907afbf to
5020d64
Compare
nunnatsa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please also check cluster-configuration-v1beta1-api.md and cluster-configuration.md
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
…gration and incrementalBackup decentralizedLiveMigration (beta) incorrectly said "Developer Preview" instead of "Tech Preview". incrementalBackup (alpha) incorrectly said "Tech Preview" instead of "Developer Preview". Signed-off-by: Harel Meir <hmeir@redhat.com>
5020d64 to
40c3c60
Compare
|
|
@hmeir: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nunnatsa The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |



What this PR does / why we need it:
decentralizedLiveMigration (beta) incorrectly said "Developer Preview" instead of "Tech Preview". incrementalBackup (alpha) incorrectly said "Tech Preview" instead of "Developer Preview".
Reviewer Checklist
Jira Ticket:
Release note: