Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: The length of the name should not be greater than 31 characters #724

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2023
Merged

Fix: The length of the name should not be greater than 31 characters #724

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

jiaxiaolei007
Copy link
Contributor

Description of your changes

In a new application, if the length of the name is greater than 31, the creation will fail . Therefore, the maximum length of a name in the UI should be limited to 31.(The relevant pr is kubevela/kubevela#5547)
image

Fixes #

I have:

  • Read and followed KubeVela's contribution process.
  • Related Docs updated properly. In a new feature or configuration option, an update to the documentation is necessary.
  • Run yarn lint to ensure the frontend changes are ready for review.
  • Run make reviewableto ensure the server changes are ready for review.
  • Added backport release-x.y labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.

Special notes for your reviewer

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.12 ⚠️

Comparison is base (93ecac2) 60.34% compared to head (98fa399) 60.22%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #724      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.34%   60.22%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines       17966    17966              
==========================================
- Hits        10841    10820      -21     
- Misses       5788     5803      +15     
- Partials     1337     1343       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
apiserver-unittests 32.22% <ø> (ø)
server-e2e-tests 49.59% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 6 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Collaborator

@barnettZQG barnettZQG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@barnettZQG
Copy link
Collaborator

@jiaxiaolei007 Please rebase the latest code.

@jiaxiaolei007
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiaxiaolei007 commented Mar 28, 2023

@jiaxiaolei007 Please rebase the latest code.

I just did it。 @barnettZQG

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants