Add release announcement for v1.32

[mbianchidev]

PR for adding the Kubernetes 1.32 release blog.

Mergeable before Kubernetes v1.32 is released since this PR contains a draft: true attribute in the file metadata.

This blog includes the majority of the identified Major themes from this discussion: kubernetes/sig-release#2639

In subsitution to the usual blog merge process it will be necessary to open a second PR to remove the draft: true attribute on the day of the release, this PR will also include the release name, the logo, the story behind the logo and the definitive date for the release webinar (chapters containing this info are marked in the title as WIP) - see this discussion.

EDIT (post-merge): Opened a follow-up PR to incorporate more feedback from the SIGs
#48955

[mbianchidev]

Holding until release 1.32 has happened - in addition to the usual process it will be necessary for a maintainer (sig-docs-blog) to remove the draft: true attribute - see this discussion.

/hold

[netlify]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	a325694
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/67503847ba2f010008d82b92
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-48666--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[sftim]

In subsitution to the usual process it will be necessary for a maintainer (sig-docs-blog) to remove the draft: true attribute once the release has happened - see this discussion.

We can have that PR ready to go (already approved, ready to unhold) ahead of the release, so that SIG Docs blog team aren't needed on release day itself.

or
the release docs team can do that approval

[mbianchidev]

In subsitution to the usual process it will be necessary for a maintainer (sig-docs-blog) to remove the draft: true attribute once the release has happened - see this discussion.

We can have that PR ready to go (already approved, ready to unhold) ahead of the release, so that SIG Docs blog team aren't needed on release day itself.

or the release docs team can do that approval

Actually we could merge this one no problem (draft: true) whenever we get a full tech + content review.
Then I could open a second PR on the day, just to remove such attribute and add the release topic and image which are under embargo, as they shouldn't require any additional review.

In this case we still don't need sig-docs people on the day and we can just operate within the release team for the second PR.

WDYT?

[sftim]

Then I could open a second PR on the day, just to remove such attribute and add the release topic and image which are under embargo, as they shouldn't require any additional review.

Almost. Don't open the second PR on the day; open it earlier and get the release-day steps agreed (we can make a written record that we're happy to see changes made on release day, that kind of thing). Then update the second PR once ready to.

[mbianchidev]

Then I could open a second PR on the day, just to remove such attribute and add the release topic and image which are under embargo, as they shouldn't require any additional review.

Almost. Don't open the second PR on the day; open it earlier and get the release-day steps agreed (we can make a written record that we're happy to see changes made on release day, that kind of thing). Then update the second PR once ready to.

Makes sense, I will open it earlier but update it on the day with the logo plus the lore behind it.
It will just contain that and a removal of draft: true.

[sftim]

🛑 Mergeable before Kubernetes v1.32 is released since this PR contains a draft: true attribute in the file metadata 🛑

Maybe take the stop symbols out of that line @mbianchidev 😉

[sftim]

I recommend rebasing on main once #48858 has merged.

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: b7783dc2136fa64898c9d050547308e81484ddc8

[sftim]

/approve cancel

Needs a new review

[haircommander]

LGTM from SIG node perspective

[sftim]

As a draft:
/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d2c1bf7606af0745933cc264c0aaa5a511869fd2

[sftim]

/hold cancel

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sftim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• content/en/blog/OWNERS [sftim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mbianchidev]

Opened a follow-up PR to fix a missing highlight from SIG Network and to incorporate eventual additional feedback from the SIGs

#48955

[sanposhiho]

Sorry for missing a review from SIG-Scheduling.
I left one minor fix, others LGTM.