Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase throughput in kubemark-scale suite #364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2016

Conversation

wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

An experiment after increasing cache sizes.

@gmarek gmarek added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 10, 2016
@gmarek gmarek merged commit a87c732 into kubernetes:master Aug 10, 2016
@wojtek-t wojtek-t deleted the kubemark_scale_larger_throughput branch August 16, 2016 13:15
ostromart pushed a commit to ostromart/test-infra that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2019
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Update to newer docker

Fixes kubernetes#364
Ran make image and make push so gcr.io/istio-testing/prowbazel:0.2.0
Is there

```release-note
Updated docker to 1.13 (equivalent to docker 17; with support for layered builds)
```
ostromart pushed a commit to ostromart/test-infra that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2019
…ernetes#366)

* Update to newer docker

Fixes kubernetes#364
Ran make image and make push so gcr.io/istio-testing/prowbazel:0.2.0
Is there

* Update docker to ce/new enough to do FROM ... AS and copy --from

Need to switch to CE to get new enough
grantr pushed a commit to grantr/test-infra that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2020
Bonuses:
* lint and link check markdown files in the default build test runner
* explicitly state if tests passed on failed
* add support to custom pre/post build/unit tests
* simplify and expand unit tests for `presubmit-tests.sh`
* also build go code containing build tags in the default build test runner
* update documentation missed in kubernetes#362
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants