-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
k8s-jkns-ci-node-e2e is busted switch to k8s-jkns-gke-gci-soak #17247
Conversation
different experiment compared to kubernetes#17243 in 17243 we switched ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet to use the general boskos pool in this, we are trying another empty project ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet-1-18
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
thanks @dims!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims, hasheddan, spiffxp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@dims: Updated the
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
different experiment compared to #17243
in 17243 we switched ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet to use the general boskos pool
in this, we are trying another empty project ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet-1-18