Skip to content

[1.16] Update to json-patch 4.9.0 #94150

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2020
Merged

[1.16] Update to json-patch 4.9.0 #94150

k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2020

Conversation

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

@liggitt liggitt commented Aug 20, 2020

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
Includes the same version bump as #94147 on master.

Does not change code, but ensures go module consumers pick up the correct version of json-patch containing fixes.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

/cc @dims

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from dims August 20, 2020 21:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.16 milestone Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/apiserver area/cloudprovider approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/dependency Issues or PRs related to dependency changes area/kubectl sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 20, 2020
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Aug 20, 2020

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Aug 20, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, liggitt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@liggitt liggitt added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Aug 21, 2020

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Aug 21, 2020

lint caught an unused dep I needed to drop

@liggitt liggitt added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2020
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Aug 21, 2020

/lgtm

@liggitt liggitt mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2020
Merged
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

fedebongio commented Aug 25, 2020

@liggitt curious why does not show cherrypick in the title?

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Aug 25, 2020

it was manually done, dependency updates don't cherry-pick cleanly

@justaugustus justaugustus added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Aug 31, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Aug 31, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 35a8da6 into kubernetes:release-1.16 Aug 31, 2020
@liggitt liggitt deleted the json-patch-1.16 branch September 2, 2020 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dims dims Awaiting requested review from dims

Assignees

@dims dims

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/apiserver area/cloudprovider area/dependency Issues or PRs related to dependency changes area/kubectl cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v1.16

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@liggitt @dims @k8s-ci-robot @fedebongio @justaugustus