Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move volume scheduling feature to GA #70673

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2018
Merged

Move volume scheduling feature to GA #70673

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2018
+2 −3

Conversation

msau42
Copy link
Member

@msau42 msau42 commented Nov 5, 2018

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews

What this PR does / why we need it:
Promote volume scheduling feature to GA

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

The VolumeScheduling feature is GA.  The VolumeScheduling feature gate is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 5, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 5, 2018
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Nov 5, 2018

/assign @saad-ali

@msau42 msau42 mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2018
Closed
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Nov 6, 2018

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

saad-ali
saad-ali approved these changes Nov 6, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@saad-ali saad-ali left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 6, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msau42, saad-ali

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 6, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b70ccc5 into kubernetes:master Nov 6, 2018
@msau42 msau42 deleted the topology-ga branch November 17, 2018 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@saad-ali saad-ali saad-ali approved these changes

@lavalamp lavalamp Awaiting requested review from lavalamp

@smarterclayton smarterclayton Awaiting requested review from smarterclayton

Assignees

@saad-ali saad-ali

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@msau42 @k8s-ci-robot @saad-ali