You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Filed an issue to represent work started here: #20273 #20696
The proposal was to scale the underlying RCs with non-zero replicas proportionally in order to mitigate risk.
Otherwise, scaling up currently increases the size of the newRC and scaling down could decrease the sizes of the old ones, both of which would have the effect of hastening the rollout progress, which could produce a higher proportion of unavailable replicas in the event of a problem with the rolled out template.
Filed an issue to represent work started here:
#20273
#20696
The proposal was to scale the underlying RCs with non-zero replicas proportionally in order to mitigate risk.
Otherwise, scaling up currently increases the size of the newRC and scaling down could decrease the sizes of the old ones, both of which would have the effect of hastening the rollout progress, which could produce a higher proportion of unavailable replicas in the event of a problem with the rolled out template.
cc @Kargakis @janetkuo @mqliang @ironcladlou
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: