-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sig-release: Add release cadence KEP #2567
Conversation
Unknown CLA label state. Rechecking for CLA labels. Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
3607cbf
to
dd9ae18
Compare
Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus <[email protected]>
Created an issue in SIG release to keep track of the survey and resolved the discussion for now. Thank you for all the feedback, reviewers! 🙏 Let's please focus on getting this KEP done and framed to its current scope. We can open broader issues/discussions in SIG release for follow-ups. For example, we already have a discussion about "releasing faster" there: kubernetes/sig-release#1495 |
/approve |
2. The last Kubernetes release of a year should be finished by the middle of | ||
December. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In regards to comments from @jberkus and @liggitt (#2567 (comment)), I think that this should be defined more precisely. I think that choosing something like December 10th (as proposed by @liggitt) makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy <[email protected]>
put my sig-node and sig-arch hat on. agree with the 12/10 proposal from @liggitt /approve |
Per SIG-Release meeting this AM: /lgtm (non-binding) |
/approve |
/approve |
/lgtm |
Still waiting for approval from @kubernetes/sig-testing |
Applying a lazy consensus until next Wednesday, April 28 at 4pm US eastern time. Ref: https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-sig-release/c/e8c72aKMHOo/m/18k62IxtAQAJ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
As SIG Testing chair
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dchen1107, derekwaynecarr, dims, johnbelamaric, justaugustus, nikopen, saschagrunert, spiffxp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
LGTM |
Hearing approvals from @kubernetes/sig-release-leads and each of the approving groups:
A lazy consensus timeout is no longer required. Thank you to everyone in the community who has provided feedback for this KEP! FYI @kubernetes/sig-release |
Announcement sent to k-announce, k-dev, CNCF maintainers, and the CNCF TOC: https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-announce/c/is_pjOd5hho |
Enhancement tracking issue: #2572
Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus [email protected]
cc: @kubernetes/sig-release-leads @kubernetes/sig-architecture-leads @kubernetes/sig-testing-leads