Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rules review API: API for a user to know which actions they can perform #380

Closed
ericchiang opened this issue Aug 1, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

Rules review API: API for a user to know which actions they can perform #380

ericchiang opened this issue Aug 1, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
@ericchiang
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status
Milestone
v1.8

Comments

@ericchiang
Copy link
Contributor

ericchiang commented Aug 1, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Feature Description

  • One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): APIs for determining the actions a user can perform in the system.
  • Primary contact (assignee): @xilabao, @ericchiang
  • Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-auth-feature-requests
  • Design proposal link (community repo): rules review API: what can I do? community#887
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred: @deads2k @cjcullen
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): @liggitt
  • Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Beta release target (1.8)
    • Stable release target (1.9)
@ericchiang ericchiang added the sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. label Aug 1, 2017
@ericchiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

xref: kubernetes/kubernetes#31292 (original issue)
xref: kubernetes/kubernetes#48051 (PR)

@ericchiang ericchiang self-assigned this Aug 1, 2017
@ericchiang ericchiang added this to the 1.8 milestone Aug 1, 2017
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label Aug 3, 2017
@ericchiang ericchiang mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2017
Merged
@ericchiang ericchiang added stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status and removed stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status labels Sep 1, 2017
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@ericchiang @kubernetes/sig-auth-feature-requests can you confirm that this feature targets 1.8?

If yes, please, update the features tracking spreadsheet with the feature data, otherwise, let's remove this item from 1.8 milestone.

Thanks

@ericchiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@idvoretskyi yes it's on target for 1.8. Added to the spreadsheet.

This was referenced Sep 19, 2017
Merged
Closed
Closed
@ericchiang ericchiang mentioned this issue Oct 13, 2017
Closed
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit to kubernetes/community that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2017
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
987e686 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 6, 2018
@ericchiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 6, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 6, 2018
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@ericchiang @kubernetes/sig-auth-feature-requests
Any plans for this in 1.11?

If so, can you please ensure the feature is up-to-date with the appropriate:

  • Description
  • Milestone
  • Assignee(s)
  • Labels:
    • stage/{alpha,beta,stable}
    • sig/*
    • kind/feature

cc @idvoretskyi

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Apr 17, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 17, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

justaugustus pushed a commit to justaugustus/enhancements that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2018
Merge pull request kubernetes#887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
374e924 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
MadhavJivrajani pushed a commit to kubernetes/design-proposals-archive that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2021
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
49f885d 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
MadhavJivrajani pushed a commit to MadhavJivrajani/design-proposals that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@MadhavJivrajani
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
e35838e 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
MadhavJivrajani pushed a commit to MadhavJivrajani/design-proposals that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@MadhavJivrajani
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
7374b9f 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
MadhavJivrajani pushed a commit to MadhavJivrajani/design-proposals that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@warmchang
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
1cbcdad 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
MadhavJivrajani pushed a commit to kubernetes/design-proposals-archive that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@warmchang
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
58463e0 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
MadhavJivrajani pushed a commit to kubernetes/design-proposals-archive that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@warmchang
Merge pull request #887 from ericchiang/rules-review-api
fc737d6 
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

rules review API: what can I do?

xref kubernetes/enhancements#380

cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-proposals @kubernetes/api-reviewers @xilabao
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ericchiang ericchiang

Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@idvoretskyi @justaugustus @ericchiang @k8s-ci-robot @fejta-bot