-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to create dynamic HA clusters with kubeadm #357
Comments
Hoping to get an alpha implementation of this in v1.8. Might or might not work out. At least a ready design doc should be ready at the end of the v1.8 cycle. |
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-feature-requests I moved this to |
Targeting alpha in v1.9 |
@luxas 👋 Please indicate in the 1.9 feature tracking board |
This feature didn't make it into v1.9 |
@luxas @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-feature-requests still on track for 1.10? |
This has been de-prioritized for 1.10 in favor of trying to get the existing kubeadm functionality promoted from beta to GA. |
@roberthbailey thanks |
@luxas / @timothysc -- Any plans for this in 1.11? If so, can you please ensure the feature is up-to-date with the appropriate:
cc @idvoretskyi |
@justaugustus No plans to move feature state this release, incremental improvements. /lifecycle frozen |
/remove-lifecycle frozen |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Hi @neolit123 Enhancements Lead here. Any plans for this to graduate in 1.20? Thanks, |
Hi, we haven't decided yet, but more likely not for 1.20.
kubernetes/kubeadm#2081
|
Thanks, I will keep this as untracked, please let us know if anything changes so we can properly tracks & milestone this KEP. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
/remove-lifecycle stale
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
Feature Description
kubeadm init
andkubeadm join
commands the users are familiar with.https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/0015-kubeadm-join-control-plane.md
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/20190122-Certificates-copy-for-kubeadm-join--control-plane.md
Edit by @spiffxp:
Per #357 (comment) we should consider kicking this out of of v1.14 and using a separate tracking issue for the actual KEP being implemented this cycle: 20190122-Certificates-copy-for-kubeadm-join--control-plane.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: