Skip to content

Conversation

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR proposes a more detailed set of Cluster Autoscaler release expectations:

  • Release more frequently (at the same cadence as k/k)
  • Clarify that minor releases may be delayed
  • Remove specific advance schedule (with specific maintainer responsibilities)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area area/cluster-autoscaler labels Oct 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 15, 2025
@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@towca @x13n @BigDarkClown Here is a first pass at defining a more general (also more ambitious) release policy. PTAL!

Copy link
Contributor

@elmiko elmiko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 15, 2025
@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Oct 15, 2025

/hold

just wanted to give others a chance to review. feel free to remove whenever.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 15, 2025
@x13n
Copy link
Member

x13n commented Oct 17, 2025

LGTM, thanks, that sounds much better for CA users!

@towca
Copy link
Collaborator

towca commented Oct 21, 2025

Thanks for taking care of this Jack!

/lgtm

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 71be489 into kubernetes:master Oct 21, 2025
7 checks passed
@jackfrancis jackfrancis deleted the ca-release-language branch October 21, 2025 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cluster-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants