Skip to content

conformance: make backend TLS tests IPv6-safe#4120

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
howardjohn:conformance/ipv6-safe
Sep 24, 2025
Merged

conformance: make backend TLS tests IPv6-safe#4120
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
howardjohn:conformance/ipv6-safe

Conversation

@howardjohn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@howardjohn howardjohn commented Sep 24, 2025

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/area conformance-test

What this PR does / why we need it:
otherwise we send requests to
http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref" which is very wrong

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@howardjohn
conformance: make backend TLS tests IPv6-safe
c411c5a 
otherwise we send requests to
`http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref"` which is
very wrong
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 24, 2025
@robscott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

robscott commented Sep 24, 2025

Thanks @howardjohn!

/lgtm
/approve
/cherry-pick release-1.4

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 24, 2025

@robscott: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

Thanks @howardjohn!

/lgtm
/approve
/cherry-pick release-1.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Sep 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: howardjohn, robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ab6b5a2 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 24, 2025
20 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 24, 2025

@robscott: new pull request created: #4121

Details

In response to this:

Thanks @howardjohn!

/lgtm
/approve
/cherry-pick release-1.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2025
Merged
tylerauerbeck pushed a commit to tylerauerbeck/gateway-api that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
@howardjohn @tylerauerbeck
conformance: make backend TLS tests IPv6-safe (kubernetes-sigs#4120)
cfb6384 
otherwise we send requests to
`http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref"` which is
very wrong
RoseWrightdev pushed a commit to RoseWrightdev/gateway-api that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
@howardjohn @RoseWrightdev
conformance: make backend TLS tests IPv6-safe (kubernetes-sigs#4120)
6efd1d9 
otherwise we send requests to
`http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref"` which is
very wrong
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mikemorris mikemorris Awaiting requested review from mikemorris

@sunjayBhatia sunjayBhatia Awaiting requested review from sunjayBhatia

Assignees

@robscott robscott

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@howardjohn @robscott @k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot @k8s-ci-robot