Lint required optional#3929
Conversation
|
This is a great change, thanks @rikatz! I think that with the GRPCRoute /approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rikatz, youngnick The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
455736d to
dc7812b
Compare
dc7812b to
97d42d2
Compare
97d42d2 to
3904698
Compare
|
/retest |
|
Thanks @rikatz! /lgtm |
* Add missing required markers on gateway types * Add missing required markers on grpcroute types * Add missing required markers on httproute types * Add missing required markers on obj_reference types * Add missing required markers on shared types * Add missing required markers on experimental types * Add missing required markers on v1beta1 types * Add missing required markers on v1alpha3 types * Add missing required markers on v1alpha2 types * Enable optionalorrequired linter * Revert objectmeta field doc * Revert minItems changes
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind test
What this PR does / why we need it: This PR enables the
optionalorrequiredlinter and fixes violations on API, without causing breaking changesWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3928
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: