Skip to content

Redefine IsEvictable to be customizable for a particular strategy#372

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
ingvagabund:isevictable
Aug 19, 2020
Merged

Redefine IsEvictable to be customizable for a particular strategy#372
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
ingvagabund:isevictable

Conversation

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

@ingvagabund ingvagabund commented Aug 13, 2020

Use WithXXX methods to extend the list of constraints to also
provide a reasonable error message.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 13, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from damemi and k82cn August 13, 2020 10:08
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 13, 2020
lixiang233
lixiang233 reviewed Aug 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
damemi
damemi reviewed Aug 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
pkg/descheduler/evictions/evictions.go

type constraint func(pod *v1.Pod) error

type evictable struct {
Copy link
Member

@damemi damemi Aug 13, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems odd that this is a private type but all the functions that work with it are public. Might be better as a public type, and then if we add more options to it in the future, it could be declared as a literal

I'm not sure on the name, I think something like EvictOptions might be clearer. wdyt?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ingvagabund ingvagabund Aug 18, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was the idea. Keep the actual implementation hidden and just rely on a single IsEvictable invocation. I have created Options struct instead of having WithPriorityThreshold as a method.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 18, 2020
damemi
damemi reviewed Aug 18, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@damemi damemi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one nit on a comment but the rest looks good at this point
/approve
/hold

feel free to remove the hold whenever you're ready

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 18, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Aug 18, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 18, 2020
@ingvagabund
Redefine IsEvictable to be customizable for a particular strategy
d8251b9 
Use WithXXX methods to extend the list of constraints to also
provide a reasonable error message.
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor Author

ingvagabund commented Aug 19, 2020

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 19, 2020
lixiang233
lixiang233 reviewed Aug 19, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lixiang233 lixiang233 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6ccd80f into kubernetes-sigs:master Aug 19, 2020
@ingvagabund ingvagabund deleted the isevictable branch August 19, 2020 11:11
@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

seanmalloy commented Aug 20, 2020

/kind cleanup

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Aug 20, 2020
briend pushed a commit to briend/descheduler that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2022
Merge pull request kubernetes-sigs#372 from ingvagabund/isevictable
6813a34 
Redefine IsEvictable to be customizable for a particular strategy
ingvagabund pushed a commit to ingvagabund/descheduler that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot
Merge pull request kubernetes-sigs#372 from openshift/konflux/referen…
2195bbc 
…ces/release-4.16

chore(deps): update konflux references
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@damemi damemi damemi left review comments

@k82cn k82cn Awaiting requested review from k82cn

+1 more reviewer

@lixiang233 lixiang233 lixiang233 left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@lixiang233 lixiang233

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ingvagabund @k8s-ci-robot @seanmalloy @damemi @lixiang233