Fix an issue where clusteractuator.Delete(...) would never succeed if the firewall rules it is attempting to delete do not exist. Move GCEClientComputeServieMock to an appropriate shared location. #378
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: spew The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
approved
spew
force-pushed
the
delete-firewall-rule-not-found
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a520de6 to
84930c4
Compare
|
/assign @mkjelland |
|
/assign @roberthbailey |
spew
force-pushed
the
delete-firewall-rule-not-found
branch
from
84930c4 to
22594f7
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ | |||
| package google_test | |||
|
|
|||
| import ( | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if you only need a single import you can put it on one line instead of in a block
| @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ | |||
| /* | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You need to fix this copyright now that we have the verify boilerplate script (it needs some blank lines).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed and added the copyright to the clientcomputeservice_test.go as well where it was missing.
|
|
||
| func newClusterActuator(t *testing.T, params google.ClusterActuatorParams) cluster.Actuator { | ||
| t.Helper() | ||
| actuator, err := google.NewClusterActuator(params) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is just making one fn call and checking for an error is there a reason you put it into a separate fn instead of putting it inline?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just did this out of force of habit since it is useful once there is more than one test (they can all make a one line function call instead of 3 lines of function call & error handling).
… the firewall rules it is attempting to delete do not exist. Move GCEClientComputeServieMock to an appropriate shared location.
spew
force-pushed
the
delete-firewall-rule-not-found
branch
from
22594f7 to
3d90b8e
Compare
|
lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
…-fix-cluster-name hack/generate-yaml.sh: fix hard-coded cluster name
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR fixes an issue where clusteractuator.Delete(...) would never succeed if the firewall rules it is attempting to delete do not exist. Therefore, it handles a NotFound error by assuming the FirewallRule has already been removed by a previous run of Delete(...) or by an external force (like a GCP adminstratro).
It also moves the GCEClientComputeServieMock to an appropriate shared location since it is being used by both the clusteractuator_test.go and machineactuator_test.go.
Release note:
@kubernetes/kube-deploy-reviewers