-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 286
🏃 Add Scopes to pass data to services #1178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
✔️ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready! 🔨 Explore the source changes: 3bde85f 🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/623477c7431ec4000871e246 😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1178--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app |
mdbooth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still like this in principal!
| Region: clientOpts.RegionName, | ||
| func NewService(scope *scope.Scope) (*Service, error) { | ||
| loadbalancerClient, err := openstack.NewLoadBalancerV2(scope.ProviderClient, gophercloud.EndpointOpts{ | ||
| Region: scope.ProviderClientOpts.RegionName, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know we're already looking into project id, but it looks like region can also be extracted from the authentication response. Lets kill ProviderClientOpts entirely as soon as we can.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good to me, I never really understood why the clientOpts were necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should probably be a follow up, though! Lets leave it alone in for this PR.
|
/test all |
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/lgtm I like the idea, for the questions that need follow up, we can anyway create a new one |
|
/hold cancel |
mdbooth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: apricote, mdbooth The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This refactoring will make it easier to pass the
ProjectIDinto the services that need it (see #1146). The Scopes pattern is also used by other CAPI Providers:Context): https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-vsphere/blob/main/pkg/context/cluster_context.go/hold