Skip to content

Conversation

@clebs
Copy link

@clebs clebs commented Oct 23, 2025

What type of PR is this?
/kind support

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR bumps CAPI to v1.11.0, and k8s to v1.33.3.

  • Update all imports to v1beta2 types except for conditions staying in v1beta1.
  • Adapt source code to work with v1beta2 and deprecated conditions.
  • Manually update conversions.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #5593

Replaces #5624

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emoji in title
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

Bump CAPI to v1.11 and k8s to v1.33

bryan-cox and others added 6 commits October 16, 2025 15:43
- Update core Kubernetes dependencies from v0.32.3 to v0.33.4:
  - k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, k8s.io/client-go
  - k8s.io/apiserver, k8s.io/cli-runtime, k8s.io/kubectl
  - k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver, k8s.io/component-base
- Upgrade prometheus/client_golang from v1.19.1 to v1.22.0
- Update cel.dev/expr from v0.18.0 to v0.19.1
- Upgrade google/cel-go from v0.22.0 to v0.23.2
- Update golang.org/x/time from v0.8.0 to v0.9.0
- Upgrade gRPC from v1.67.3 to v1.68.1
- Update OpenTelemetry packages to v1.33.0
- Refresh k8s.io/utils and other indirect dependencies
- Update kube-openapi and structured-merge-diff versions
- Upgrade cluster-api from v1.10.2 to v1.11.1
- Upgrade controller-runtime from v0.20.4 to v0.21.0
- Update various golang.org/x/* packages
- Update testing dependencies (ginkgo, gomega)
- Update OpenTelemetry and other indirect dependencies
Signed-off-by: Borja Clemente <[email protected]>
- Update all imports to v1beta2 types except for conditions staying in
  v1beta1.
- Adapt source code to work with v1beta2 and deprecated conditions.
- Manually update conversions.

Signed-off-by: Borja Clemente <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. labels Oct 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ankitasw for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @clebs!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @clebs. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 23, 2025
@clebs
Copy link
Author

clebs commented Oct 23, 2025

@richardcase This PR here based on @bryan-cox's: #5720

Changes:

  • Rebased the PR to main
  • Fixed missing/wrong go modules
  • Updated all imports to use the new v1beta2 API, except for conditions which stay on v1beta1
  • Adapted all the code to properly use the new types
  • Add adapters to use v1beta1.Conditions with v1beta1types
  • Manually fix converters for FailureDomains

Current state:

  • Code compiles
  • Generation fails because of manual conversions required
  • Working on linting issues

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 23, 2025
clebs added 6 commits October 24, 2025 12:29
Signed-off-by: Borja Clemente <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borja Clemente <[email protected]>
Introducing v1beta2 on public types is a breaking change so they have to
stay in v1beta1. Internally though, migration to v1beta2 is happening
(except for conditions).

Signed-off-by: Borja Clemente <[email protected]>
@clebs clebs requested a review from chrischdi October 27, 2025 15:08
klog.Errorf("Expected a Machine but got a %T", o)
}
if m.Spec.Bootstrap.ConfigRef != nil && m.Spec.Bootstrap.ConfigRef.GroupVersionKind() == eksbootstrapv1.GroupVersion.WithKind("EKSConfig") {
if m.Spec.Bootstrap.ConfigRef.Name != "" && m.Spec.Bootstrap.ConfigRef.APIGroup == eksbootstrapv1.GroupVersion.Group && m.Spec.Bootstrap.ConfigRef.Kind == eksConfigKind {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before: this compared group, version and kind.

Now it compares group and kind only.

Intended?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same below.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I can tell, ContractVersionedObjectReference does not have a version we can check whereas the old ObjectRef did.
Am I missing something?

@clebs clebs force-pushed the bump-capi-k8s-deps branch from f0121a8 to 60d7f75 Compare October 27, 2025 15:33
AWSMachineDeletionFailed = "AWSMachineDeletionFailed"
// V1Beta2LifecycleHookReadyCondition reports on the status of the lifecycle hook.
// TODO: delete when conditions are migrated.
V1Beta2LifecycleHookReadyCondition clusterv1.ConditionType = "LifecycleHookReady"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is used below to be set as v1beta1 condition?! Does not seem to be right for me.

if !controlPlane.Status.Ready {
log.Info("Control plane is not ready yet")
conditions.MarkFalse(fargateProfile, clusterv1.ReadyCondition, expinfrav1.WaitingForEKSControlPlaneReason, clusterv1.ConditionSeverityInfo, "")
v1beta1conditions.MarkFalse(fargateProfile, clusterv1.ReadyCondition, expinfrav1.WaitingForEKSControlPlaneReason, clusterv1beta1.ConditionSeverityInfo, "")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sets a v1beta2 condition using the v1beta1 utility. This is wrong.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Absolutely, wondering why it was not a compilation error...
Fixed thanks!

@clebs clebs force-pushed the bump-capi-k8s-deps branch from 4d0faa6 to e6be7ad Compare October 27, 2025 16:08
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking

@damdo damdo mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2025
5 tasks
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@clebs: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main 86e16b3 link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test 86e16b3 link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking 86e16b3 link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 30, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. needs-priority needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CAPI v1.11.0 has been released and is ready for testing

6 participants