Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add flags for leaderElection timeouts #4845

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

nikParasyr
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add flags on manager to configure leaseDuration, renewDeadline and RetryPeriod for leader election. Set defaults based on cluster-api. These flags can be useful when the cluster runs on a relatively slow etcd.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emojis

Release note:

add flags to manager for leaderElection timeouts

Add flags on manager to configure leaseDuration,
renewDeadline and RetryPeriod for leader election.
Set defaults based on cluster-api.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from AndiDog and nrb March 4, 2024 15:19
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @nikParasyr!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @nikParasyr. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nikParasyr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure whether this should be categorized as ✨ or 🌱

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 5, 2024
@nrb
Copy link
Contributor

nrb commented Mar 5, 2024

@nikParasyr I think ✨ is fine

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Mar 5, 2024

Let's see if the new defaults work fine in an E2E

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@nikParasyr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@nrb
Copy link
Contributor

nrb commented Mar 7, 2024

/retest

@nikParasyr
Copy link
Contributor Author

e2e passed but there were a couple of failed runs. Are they flaky or are the defaults not "so sane"?

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Mar 12, 2024

@nikParasyr I don't see leader election churn in the CAPA controller logs for the failed E2E runs:

$ curl -sL https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api-provider-aws/4845/pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e/1765438070502461440/artifacts/clusters/bootstrap/controllers/capa-controller-manager/capa-controller-manager-6b8f8b488c-kwsbn/manager.log | grep leader

I0306 18:18:11.235696       1 leaderelection.go:250] attempting to acquire leader lease capa-system/controller-leader-elect-capa...
I0306 18:18:11.242312       1 leaderelection.go:260] successfully acquired lease capa-system/controller-leader-elect-capa
I0306 18:18:11.242916       1 recorder.go:104] "events: capa-controller-manager-6b8f8b488c-kwsbn_b073f072-da92-434f-a015-f43ddac83c9f became leader" type="Normal" object={"kind":"Lease","namespace":"capa-system","name":"controller-leader-elect-capa","uid":"fa6fe129-aeb8-4a9a-9c21-f89b48547ad9","apiVersion":"coordination.k8s.io/v1","resourceVersion":"1062"} reason="LeaderElection"

Plus I've seen those timeouts in other runs.
IMO unrelated. So PR should be good

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 12, 2024
@Ankitasw
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ankitasw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2e16f31 into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 22, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants