-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
Documentation of long-term managing capabilities #61
Comments
This project is definitely geared towards full cluster lifecycle issues - initializing takes the most effort right now so it gets the most attention. We should add a cluster lifecycle management document which describes various runbook scenarios, though i feel like most of those things should happen automatically soon (like manually scaling up (&down) a cluster) |
I'd definitely like to add that kind of documentation to kube-aws. |
@mumoshu first why not use wiki tab of this repo... as main documentation... Community can easily contribute to it. |
+1 for adding extra workers to the initial cluster. |
@aholbreich We're maintaining docs in git because we don't want to diverge our documentations and wiki doesn't allow reviews. I personally like GitHub wiki. However, currently, everything under the Also AFAIK wiki doesn't allow reviews or pull requests before updating. I'm not yet sure how I could efficiently maintain a wiki which I can't handle when/how/by whom it is updated. Everything is possible if I could have infinite time and/or more contributors/maintainers but in the mean time, as a primary maintainer, I'd rather like to focus on merging pull requests, tackling big refactorings, implementing new features, in order of priority, because these are what (I believe) only a maintainer can do right now. Regardless of our current situation, I'd definitely like to have more documentation in kube-aws hence the |
…eaws-funcmaps-within-customfile-templates to hcom-flavour * commit 'decba92d22683cf3a093dc1c5b3882b04ff1f126': Use kube-aws texttemplate Parse so we have access to its funcmaps.
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Maybe this is only documentation issue...
But for me it appears to be unclear if this project is meant to support created kubernetes cluster over time or just initial provisioning.
If it is meant to be long term support i miss a docuimetnation (wiki?), that states clearly what to do i common situation like scaling to new number if nodes or another management stuff.
Lucky, there is propably not so much, but still worth to document it clear in detail for those who not involved in this project so much - but just want to use it. Or step before, get idea of it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: