-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
Bump kube dependencies to v1.19.0 #101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@redhat.com>
|
/release-note-none |
|
/assign @gnufied |
|
/test pull-kubernetes-csi-external-resizer-unit |
| require ( | ||
| github.com/container-storage-interface/spec v1.2.0 | ||
| github.com/container-storage-interface/spec v1.3.0 | ||
| github.com/imdario/mergo v0.3.9 // indirect |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you intend to update CSI spec or did the update come via k8s client update?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gnufied I deliberately updated it , but forgot to explictly mention it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather not update that in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@humblec I see no reason to update CSI spec at last minute within resizer repo. Also have we updated other sidecar's CSI spec version? k8s repo at least is still using 1.2.0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gnufied I can revert the change too.. please let me know the choice
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gnufied better I reverted.. We will update the SPEC 1.3 accordingly. PTAL
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied, humblec The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal hchiramm@redhat.com
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: