Conversation
|
@RaunakShah: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: RaunakShah The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
d3f9742 to
fa088d6
Compare
|
@RaunakShah: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
| require ( | ||
| github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 v2.1.6 | ||
| github.com/onsi/gomega v1.20.1 | ||
| k8s.io/kubernetes v1.25.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The rest of the file uses v0.25.2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can ignore this PR. I'm just using it as a PoC for kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#206
|
Closing this as https://github.com/kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools/pull/206/files was merged. |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Test for kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#206
Ignore all vendor changes.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: