Maintainers/Codeowners - future development of the project

[pat-s]

@mysticaltech Are there any ideas to extend the development of this project to a group of people? While you did a lot/the most for this judging from the commit log and have reasonable response times, I wonder if extending permissions for PR reviews and other actions to a group of people would help the project moving forward?

Also, the project is owned by the kube-hetzner org. Currently only one member is publicly visible and the overall governance is a bit unclear.

Would be cool to shine some light on these points moving forward, for me personally and I assume more fellow users/readers :)

[mysticaltech]

Hey @pat-s, appreciate the input. There's a bunch of us with commit access +10, and some with merge access too. I will investigate why the team members are not showing.

For the moment, I will continue to lead the project, and we will improve time to resolution of issues.

Also, there may be some important changes in the codebase thanks to v3 that @aleksasiriski is working on. More news on that soon, when he's ready to share.

We will probably publish another branch for that first, to gather feedback.

So things are moving and we will keep on trying to make the project better and more stable.

[aleksasiriski]

Hey there, I'm pushing the move to a better structure of the project with many modules. I've stopped helping with issues and PRs on the current version of the project because of that since much of my time has been taken by the rewrite and work, but after the release of that I will continue with supporting the project.