Skip to content

chore(RHTAPWATCH-1297): Add rpms-signature-scan to template#1480

Merged
lcarva merged 1 commit into
konflux-ci:mainfrom
avi-biton:template
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

chore(RHTAPWATCH-1297): Add rpms-signature-scan to template#1480
lcarva merged 1 commit into
konflux-ci:mainfrom
avi-biton:template

Conversation

@avi-biton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add rpms-signature-scan

Before you complete this pull request ...

Look for any open pull requests in the repository with the title "e2e-tests update" and
see if there are recent e2e-tests updates that will be applicable to your change.

@avi-biton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Please merge #1482 before merging this PR.
I added a fix to the readme file and I want to rerun the /hack/generate-pipelines-readme.py script to pick up the changes

Add rpms-signature-scan to template

Signed-off-by: Avi Biton <abiton@redhat.com>
@avi-biton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

#1482 was merged.
I rebased and rerun the /hack/generate-pipelines-readme.py script

- name: workspace
workspace: workspace

- name: rpms-signature-scan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need this task for all pipelines and all users?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe so. It's how Konflux will be able to enforce that all included RPMs are signed with the right key via EC.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, @mmorhun thats the feature.
This is the refinement doc
This is the feature

cc @ralphbean @lcarva

@avi-biton avi-biton requested a review from mmorhun September 30, 2024 13:48
@lcarva lcarva added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into konflux-ci:main with commit 2c037ad Sep 30, 2024
arewm added a commit to arewm/build-definitions that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
In konflux-ci#1480, we added the rpms-signature-scan task to the pipeline
template. This resulted in the task being added to multiple pipelines
unnecessarily.

Signed-off-by: arewm <arewm@users.noreply.github.com>
arewm added a commit to arewm/build-definitions that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
In konflux-ci#1480, we added the rpms-signature-scan task to the pipeline
template. This resulted in the task being added to multiple pipelines
unnecessarily.

Also removed additional unnecessary tasks from the tekton bundle builder
pipeline.

Signed-off-by: arewm <arewm@users.noreply.github.com>
arewm added a commit to arewm/build-definitions that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
In konflux-ci#1480, we added the rpms-signature-scan task to the pipeline
template. This resulted in the task being added to multiple pipelines
unnecessarily.

Also removed additional unnecessary tasks from the tekton bundle builder
pipeline.

Signed-off-by: arewm <arewm@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
In #1480, we added the rpms-signature-scan task to the pipeline
template. This resulted in the task being added to multiple pipelines
unnecessarily.

Also removed additional unnecessary tasks from the tekton bundle builder
pipeline.

Signed-off-by: arewm <arewm@users.noreply.github.com>
manish-jangra pushed a commit to manish-jangra/build-definitions that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
In konflux-ci#1480, we added the rpms-signature-scan task to the pipeline
template. This resulted in the task being added to multiple pipelines
unnecessarily.

Also removed additional unnecessary tasks from the tekton bundle builder
pipeline.

Signed-off-by: arewm <arewm@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants